Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20483156›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of urology2010

Circumcision and reduced risk of self-reported penile coital injuries: results from a randomized controlled trial in Kisumu, Kenya.

Supriya D Mehta, John N Krieger, Kawango Agot, Stephen Moses, Jeckoniah O Ndinya-Achola, Corette Parker, Robert C Bailey

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of urology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Canadian Urological Association guideline on the care of the normal foreskin and neonatal circumcision in Canadian infants (full version).Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2018
    Article
  14. Canadian Urological Association guideline on the care of the normal foreskin and neonatal circumcision in Canadian infants (abridged version).Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Copulatory wounding and traumatic insemination.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2015
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Supriya D MehtaDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA. supriyad@uic.edu
John N Krieger
Kawango Agot
Stephen Moses
Jeckoniah O Ndinya-Achola
Corette Parker
Robert C Bailey
University of Illinois Chicago · USGreat Lakes University of Kisumu · KERTI International · USUniversity of Manitoba · CAUniversity of Nairobi · KEUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Trial of Male Circumcision to Reduce HIV IncidenceU01AI050440 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI BAILEY, ROBERT CONVERSE · 2001 to 2009
$14.7M
CIHRNIAID NIH HHS AI50440NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI050440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeInjuries to the penis during intercourse represent a hypothesized mechanism by which uncircumcised men are at increased risk for HIV. There are no published, systematically collected data regarding mild penile coital trauma to our knowledge. We identified risks of self-reported penile coital injuries in men 18 to 24 years old in a randomized trial of circumcision to prevent HIV in Kisumu, Kenya. MATERIALS AND

methodsEach participant underwent standardized interview, medical history and physical examination at baseline, and 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after enrollment. Self-reported penile coital injuries were assessed at each visit, and were defined as penis feels sore during sex, penis gets scratches, cuts or abrasions during sex, and skin of the penis bleeds after sex. Generalized estimating equation analysis estimated odds ratios for penile coital injuries.

resultsFrom February 2002 to September 2005, 2,784 participants were randomized. At baseline 1,775 (64.4%) men reported any coital injury including 1,313 (47.6%) soreness, 1,328 (48.2%) scratches, abrasions or cuts and 461 (16.7%) bleeding. On multivariable analysis coital injury risk was lower for circumcised than for uncircumcised men with soreness (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.64-0.80), scratches/abrasions/cuts (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.46-0.59), bleeding (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.51-0.75) and any coital injury (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.54-0.68). Other significant risks included increasing age, multiple recent sex partners, HSV-2 seropositivity and genital ulcers (p <0.05). Condom use, cleaning the penis soon after intercourse and being married/cohabiting were protective (p <0.05, each).

conclusionsSelf-reported penile coital injuries were common in these healthy young men. Circumcised men were at lower risk for coital injuries. Verifying penile coital injuries, the mechanism of acquisition and the association with HIV risk is needed.

Indexed as

Circumcision, MaleCoitusAdolescentHIV InfectionsHumansKenyaMalePenisSexual BehaviorWounds and InjuriesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID20483156
PMCPMC3090633
OpenAlexW1973505427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.