ArticleBMC genetics2010
Characterisation of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L. ssp. vulgaris) varieties using microsatellite markers.
Article in BMC genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- A key gene for vernalization-independent bolting under extra-long days in biennial sugar beet.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Genetic Diversity in Sugar Beet Using SCoT and ISSR Markers.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Assessment of Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Exotic Sugar Beet (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Salt stress vs. salt shock - the case of sugar beet and its halophytic ancestor.BMC plant biology · 2019Article
- Variation in sequences containing microsatellite motifs in the perennial biomass and forage grass, Phalaris arundinacea (Poaceae).BMC research notes · 2016Article
- The polyploidy and its key role in plant breeding.Planta · 2016Review
- Genetic Diversity and Physiological Performance of Portuguese Wild Beet (Beta vulgaris spp. maritima) from Three Contrasting Habitats.Frontiers in plant science · 2016Article
- Article
- SBMDb: first whole genome putative microsatellite DNA marker database of sugarbeet for bioenergy and industrial applications.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2015Article
- Genetic diversity and linkage disequilibrium analysis in elite sugar beet breeding lines and wild beet accessions.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2014Article
- Isolation and characterization of microsatellite markers and analysis of genetic variability in Curculigo latifolia Dryand.Molecular biology reports · 2012Article
- Estimation of pea (Pisum sativum L.) microsatellite mutation rate based on pedigree and single-seed descent analyses.Journal of applied genetics · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSugar beet is an obligate outcrossing species. Varieties consist of mixtures of plants from various parental combinations. As the number of informative morphological characteristics is limited, this leads to some problems in variety registration research.
resultsWe have developed 25 new microsatellite markers for sugar beet. A selection of 12 markers with high quality patterns was used to characterise 40 diploid and triploid varieties. For each variety 30 individual plants were genotyped. The markers amplified 3-21 different alleles. Varieties had up to 7 different alleles at one marker locus. All varieties could be distinguished. For the diploid varieties, the expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.458 to 0.744. The average inbreeding coefficient F(is) was 0.282 +/- 0.124, but it varied widely among marker loci, from F(is) = +0.876 (heterozygote deficiency) to F(is) = -0.350 (excess of heterozygotes). The genetic differentiation among diploid varieties was relatively constant among markers (F(st) = 0.232 +/- 0.027). Among triploid varieties the genetic differentiation was much lower (F(st) = 0.100 +/- 0.010). The overall genetic differentiation between diploid and triploid varieties was F(st) = 0.133 across all loci. Part of this differentiation may coincide with the differentiation among breeders' gene pools, which was Fst = 0.063.
conclusionsBased on a combination of scores for individual plants all varieties can be distinguished using the 12 markers developed here. The markers may also be used for mapping and in molecular breeding. In addition, they may be employed in studying gene flow from crop to wild populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.