Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20482792›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic pathology2010

Combined evaluation of bone marrow aspirate and biopsy is superior in the prognosis of multiple myeloma.

Sanja Stifter, Emina Babarović, Toni Valković, Irena Seili-Bekafigo, Christophe Stemberger, Antica Nacinović, Ksenija Lucin, Nives Jonjić

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic pathology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Dynamic Profiling of Antitumor Activity of CAR T Cells Using Micropatterned Tumor Arrays.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Aggressive multiple myeloma with unusual morphology.Turkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology · 2014
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sanja StifterDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Braće Branchetta 20, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia.
Emina Babarović
Toni Valković
Irena Seili-Bekafigo
Christophe Stemberger
Antica Nacinović
Ksenija Lucin
Nives Jonjić

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEstimation of plasma cell infiltrates in bone marrow aspirates (BMA) and bone marrow biopsy (BMB) is a standard method in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple myeloma (MM). Plasma cell fraction in the bone marrow is therefore critical for the classification and optimal clinical management of patients with plasma cell dyscrasias. The aim of the study was to compare the percentage of plasma cells obtained by both methods with the patient clinical parameters and survival.

methodsThis retrospective study included BMA and BMB of 59 MM patients. The conventional differential count was determined in BMA to estimate the percentage and cytologic grade of plasma cells. The pattern of neoplastic infiltration and percentage of plasma cells were estimated on CD138 immunostained BMB slides microscopically and by computer-assisted image analysis (CIA).

resultsSignificantly higher values of plasma cell infiltrates were observed in pathologist (47.7 +/- 24.8) and CIA (44.1 +/- 30.6) reports in comparison with cytologist analysis (30.6 +/- 17.1; P < 0.001 and P < 0.0048, respectively). BMB assessment by pathologist counting and using CIA showed strongest correlation (r = 0.8; P < 0.0001). Correlation was also observed between the pathologist and cytologist counts (r = 0.321; P = 0.015) as well as comparing the percentage of plasma cells in BMA and CIA (r = 0.27; P = 0.05). Patients with clinical stage I/II had a significantly lower CIA plasma cell count than those with clinical stage III (P = 0.008). Overall survival was shorter in patients with more than 25% of atypical plasma cell morphology estimated in BMA (P = 0.05) and a higher percentage of tumor cell infiltrates estimated by the pathologist and CIA (P = 0.0341 and P = 0.013, respectively).

conclusionStudy results suggested the combined analyses to be useful as a routine procedure to achieve more accurate and informative diagnostic data.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiopsyBiopsy, NeedleBone MarrowBone Marrow ExaminationFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMultiple MyelomaNeoplasm StagingPlasma CellsSDC1 protein, humanSyndecan-1

Identifiers

PMID20482792
PMCPMC2883968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.