ReviewPaediatric drugs2010
Escitalopram: in the treatment of major depressive disorder in adolescent patients.
Review in Paediatric drugs, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Citalopram versus other anti-depressive agents for depression.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Escitalopram for Major Depressive Disorder in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Age-Specific Findings.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2026Review
- A Step Toward Precision Dosing of Escitalopram in Chinese Patients: An External Evaluation of Published Population Pharmacokinetic Models.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Article
- Low Escitalopram Concentrations in Patients with Depression predict Treatment Failure: A Naturalistic Retrospective Study.Pharmacopsychiatry · 2023Article
- Concentrations of escitalopram in blood of patients treated in a naturalistic setting: focus on patients with alcohol and benzodiazepine use disorder.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2023Article
- Population pharmacokinetics model for escitalopram in Chinese psychiatric patients: effect of CYP2C19 and age.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Ontogeny and regulation of the serotonin transporter: providing insights into human disorders.Pharmacology & therapeutics · 2011Review
- Escitalopram: a review of its use in the management of major depressive disorder in adults.CNS drugs · 2010Review
- Escitalopram in the treatment of major depressive disorder in adolescent patients. Profile report.CNS drugs · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Escitalopram is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), and is the second antidepressant to be approved for use in treating major depressive disorder (MDD) in adolescent patients (aged 12-17 years) in the US. In a randomized, double-blind, flexible-dose, multicenter trial, once-daily escitalopram 10-20 mg (n = 154) for 8 weeks was significantly better than placebo (n = 157) in improving the severity of depressive symptoms (as assessed by the change in the Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised [CDRS-R] total score) in adolescent patients with MDD. Preliminary data from a combined analysis of the double-blind data from this trial and double-blind data from a 16-week, fixed-dose, extension study suggest a significant difference between escitalopram and placebo recipients in the change in CDRS-R total scores after 24 weeks of treatment. In a similarly designed flexible-dose trial in pediatric patients (aged 6-17 years), a significant difference between once-daily escitalopram 10-20 mg (n = 77) and placebo (n = 80) for 8 weeks, as assessed by the change in CDRS-R total score, was not shown in the primary analysis (i.e. patients of all ages). In a pre-specified subgroup of adolescent patients, no significant difference was shown between the escitalopram and the placebo groups when analyzed using the last observation carried forward method, but was shown using the observed case method. Escitalopram 10-20 mg/day showed better efficacy than placebo for some secondary endpoints (e.g. the change in the Clinical Global Impression [CGI]-Severity score, the CGI-Improvement response rate) but not others (e.g. CDRS-R response rate, rate of remission) [corrected].Once-daily escitalopram 10-20 mg for 8 weeks was generally well tolerated in clinical trials in adolescent or pediatric patients with MDD. The incidence of suicidality-related adverse events was generally similar between escitalopram and placebo recipients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.