Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20480130›Full record

ReviewDer Internist2010

[Stroke].

C Lichy, W Hacke

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Internist, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

C LichyNeurologische Klinik, Klinikum Memmingen, Bismarckstrasse 23, 87700, Memmingen, Germany. christoph.lichy@klinikum-memmingen.de
W Hacke

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute stroke must be considered as an emergency with highest priority. The same is true for patients with transient ischemic attacks, given their high risk for following stroke events within the first 48 hours. Early brain imaging is essential for discrimination of either ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. In acute ischemic stroke, rapid establishment of reperfusion is the major therapeutic goal. This is achieved by intravenous thrombolysis, in selected cases by an intraarterial approach with pharmaceutical and/or mechanical recanalization. The effect of successful reperfusion is highly dependent on time: the earlier, the better the odds for substantial clinical improvement. The recent extension of the time window for systemic thrombolysis to 4.5 hours must not result in any delays of diagnosis and treatment initiation! Stroke units with facilities for early etiological workup with according secondary prevention measures, for prevention and treatment of complications, and for early rehabilitation have been shown to yield the best outcome for all stroke victims.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalAcute DiseaseAngioplastyCerebral HemorrhageCerebral InfarctionCooperative BehaviorDiagnosis, DifferentialHospital UnitsHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationIschemic Attack, TransientPatient Care TeamRisk FactorsThrombolytic Therapy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.