Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20479932›Full record

ArticlePloS one2010

ETS transcription factors control transcription of EZH2 and epigenetic silencing of the tumor suppressor gene Nkx3.1 in prostate cancer.

Paolo Kunderfranco, Maurizia Mello-Grand, Romina Cangemi, Stefania Pellini, Afua Mensah, Veronica Albertini, Anastasia Malek, Giovanna Chiorino, Carlo V Catapano, Giuseppina M Carbone

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 143 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Chromoplexy: A Pathway to Genomic Complexity and Cancer Development.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Chromoplexy.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. circEZH2Cancer science · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Paolo KunderfrancoLaboratory of Experimental Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Maurizia Mello-Grand
Romina Cangemi
Stefania Pellini
Afua Mensah
Veronica Albertini
Anastasia Malek
Giovanna Chiorino
Carlo V Catapano
Giuseppina M Carbone
Institute of Oncology Research · CHFondazione Edo ed Elvo Tempia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundETS transcription factors regulate important signaling pathways involved in cell differentiation and development in many tissues and have emerged as important players in prostate cancer. However, the biological impact of ETS factors in prostate tumorigenesis is still debated. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe performed an analysis of the ETS gene family using microarray data and real-time PCR in normal and tumor tissues along with functional studies in normal and cancer cell lines to understand the impact in prostate tumorigenesis and identify key targets of these transcription factors. We found frequent dysregulation of ETS genes with oncogenic (i.e., ERG and ESE1) and tumor suppressor (i.e., ESE3) properties in prostate tumors compared to normal prostate. Tumor subgroups (i.e., ERG(high), ESE1(high), ESE3(low) and NoETS tumors) were identified on the basis of their ETS expression status and showed distinct transcriptional and biological features. ERG(high) and ESE3(low) tumors had the most robust gene signatures with both distinct and overlapping features. Integrating genomic data with functional studies in multiple cell lines, we demonstrated that ERG and ESE3 controlled in opposite direction transcription of the Polycomb Group protein EZH2, a key gene in development, differentiation, stem cell biology and tumorigenesis. We further demonstrated that the prostate-specific tumor suppressor gene Nkx3.1 was controlled by ERG and ESE3 both directly and through induction of EZH2. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These findings provide new insights into the role of the ETS transcriptional network in prostate tumorigenesis and uncover previously unrecognized links between aberrant expression of ETS factors, deregulation of epigenetic effectors and silencing of tumor suppressor genes. The link between aberrant ETS activity and epigenetic gene silencing may be relevant for the clinical management of prostate cancer and design of new therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

Gene SilencingTranscription, GeneticAgedAnoikisCell MovementDNA-Binding ProteinsEnhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 ProteinGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Knockdown TechniquesHistonesHomeodomain ProteinsHumansLysineMaleMethylationDNA-Binding ProteinsEnhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 ProteinERG protein, humanEZH2 protein, humanHistonesHomeodomain ProteinsLysineNKX3-1 protein, humanPolycomb Repressive Complex 2Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-etsTrans-ActivatorsTranscriptional Regulator ERGTranscription FactorsTumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20479932
PMCPMC2866657
OpenAlexW1982538300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.