Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20479206›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2010

Secondary integrase resistance mutations found in HIV-1 minority quasispecies in integrase therapy-naive patients have little or no effect on susceptibility to integrase inhibitors.

Francesca Ceccherini-Silberstein, Kurt Van Baelen, Daniele Armenia, Maria Trignetti, Evelien Rondelez, Lavinia Fabeni, Fernanda Scopelliti, Michela Pollicita, Liesbeth Van Wesenbeeck, Veerle Van Eygen and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Clinical implications of HIV-1 minority variants.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2013
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Francesca Ceccherini-SilbersteinDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy. ceccherini@med.uniroma2.it
Kurt Van Baelen
Daniele Armenia
Maria Trignetti
Evelien Rondelez
Lavinia Fabeni
Fernanda Scopelliti
Michela Pollicita
Liesbeth Van Wesenbeeck
Veerle Van Eygen
Luca Dori
Loredana Sarmati
Stefano Aquaro
Guido Palamara
Massimo Andreoni
Lieven J Stuyver
Carlo Federico Perno
University of Rome Tor Vergata · ITSan Gallicano Hospital · ITUniversity of Calabria · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of this study was to explore the presence of integrase strand transfer inhibitor (InSTI) resistance mutations in HIV-1 quasispecies present in InSTI-naïve patients and to evaluate their in vitro effects on phenotypic susceptibility to InSTIs and their replication capacities. The RT-RNase H-IN region was PCR amplified from plasma viral RNA obtained from 49 HIV-1 subtype B-infected patients (21 drug naïve and 28 failing highly active antiretroviral therapy [HAART] not containing InSTIs) and recombined with an HXB2-based backbone with RT and IN deleted. Recombinant viruses were tested against raltegravir and elvitegravir and for replication capacity. Three-hundred forty-four recombinant viruses from 49 patients were successfully analyzed both phenotypically and genotypically. The majority of clones were not phenotypically resistant to InSTIs: 0/344 clones showed raltegravir resistance, and only 3 (0.87%) showed low-level elvitegravir resistance. No primary resistance mutations for raltegravir and elvitegravir were found as major or minor species. The majority of secondary mutations were also absent or rarely present. Secondary mutations, such as T97A and G140S, found rarely and only as minority quasispecies, were present in the elvitegravir-resistant clones. A novel mutation, E92G, although rarely found in minority quasispecies, showed elvitegravir resistance. Preexisting genotypic and phenotypic raltegravir resistance was extremely rare in InSTI-naïve patients and confined to only a restricted minority of secondary variants. Overall, these results, together with others based on population and ultradeep sequencing, suggest that at this point IN genotyping in all patients before raltegravir treatment may not be cost-effective and should not be recommended until evidence of transmitted drug resistance to InSTIs or the clinical relevance of IN minor variants/polymorphisms is determined.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, ViralGenotypeHIV IntegraseHIV Integrase InhibitorsHumansMutationPhenotypePyrrolidinonesQuinolonesRaltegravir PotassiumelvitegravirHIV IntegraseHIV Integrase InhibitorsPyrrolidinonesQuinolonesRaltegravir Potassium

Identifiers

PMID20479206
PMCPMC2935022
OpenAlexW2108497544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.