Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20479151›Full record

SynthesisCirculation2010

Red and processed meat consumption and risk of incident coronary heart disease, stroke, and diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Renata Micha, Sarah K Wallace, Dariush Mozaffarian

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Circulation, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 485 papers, 17 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
485citing papers in PubMed, 17 pooled it
58.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03999632 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Aquatic Plant Protein Source Wolffia Globosa (Mankai) on Weight Loss, Cardiometabolic State, and Patient's Satisfaction During the Preoperative Dietary Intervention Period in Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery.

TypeinterventionalSponsorCleveland Clinic FloridaRan2019 to 2020Enrolled3ConditionsBariatric Surgery Candidate, Diet ModificationArmsDietary modification with introduction of Mankai
NCT06157385 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Culinary Medicine to Enhance Protein Intake on Muscle Quality in Older Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorTexas Tech UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled28ConditionsSarcopeniaArmsCulinary Medicine, Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

485 citing papers in PubMed, 17 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,248 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2022
    Guideline
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

425 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Renata MichaDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. rmicha@hsph.harvard.edu
Sarah K Wallace
Dariush Mozaffarian
Brigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

Fatty Acids and Major Cardiovascular OutcomesR01HL085710 · NHLBI · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI MOZAFFARIAN, DARIUSH · 2006 to 2016
$5.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL 085710NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL085710
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeat consumption is inconsistently associated with development of coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, and diabetes mellitus, limiting quantitative recommendations for consumption levels. Effects of meat intake on these different outcomes, as well as of red versus processed meat, may also vary. METHODS AND

resultsWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence for relationships of red (unprocessed), processed, and total meat consumption with incident CHD, stroke, and diabetes mellitus. We searched for any cohort study, case-control study, or randomized trial that assessed these exposures and outcomes in generally healthy adults. Of 1598 identified abstracts, 20 studies met inclusion criteria, including 17 prospective cohorts and 3 case-control studies. All data were abstracted independently in duplicate. Random-effects generalized least squares models for trend estimation were used to derive pooled dose-response estimates. The 20 studies included 1 218 380 individuals and 23 889 CHD, 2280 stroke, and 10 797 diabetes mellitus cases. Red meat intake was not associated with CHD (n=4 studies; relative risk per 100-g serving per day=1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.81 to 1.23; P for heterogeneity=0.36) or diabetes mellitus (n=5; relative risk=1.16; 95% confidence interval, 0.92 to 1.46; P=0.25). Conversely, processed meat intake was associated with 42% higher risk of CHD (n=5; relative risk per 50-g serving per day=1.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.07 to 1.89; P=0.04) and 19% higher risk of diabetes mellitus (n=7; relative risk=1.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.11 to 1.27; P<0.001). Associations were intermediate for total meat intake. Consumption of red and processed meat were not associated with stroke, but only 3 studies evaluated these relationships.

conclusionsConsumption of processed meats, but not red meats, is associated with higher incidence of CHD and diabetes mellitus. These results highlight the need for better understanding of potential mechanisms of effects and for particular focus on processed meats for dietary and policy recommendations.

Indexed as

Coronary DiseaseDiabetes MellitusDietHumansIncidenceMeatMeat ProductsRisk FactorsStroke

Identifiers

PMID20479151
PMCPMC2885952
OpenAlexW2109401990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.