ArticleGenetics2010
Identification of selection signatures in cattle breeds selected for dairy production.
Article in Genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 145 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Meta-Assembly of Selection Signatures in Cattle.PloS one · 2016Pooled it
- RASEL: An Ensemble Model for Selection of Core SNPs and Its Application for Identification and Classification of Cattle Breeds.Biochemical genetics · 2026Article
- Main Husbandry Practices and Health Conditions That Affect Welfare in Calves: A Narrative Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Evidence of early genomic selection in Holstein Friesian across African and European ecosystems.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Genome-wide association studies and genetic architecture of carcass traits in Angus beef cattle using imputed whole-genome sequences data.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2025Article
- Genome-wide copy number variation regions in indigenous (Bos indicus) cattle breeds of Tamil Nadu, India.Animal bioscience · 2025Article
- Dissecting the genomic regions of selection on the X chromosome in different cattle breeds.3 Biotech · 2024Article
- Genetic diversity and recent ancestry based on whole-genome sequencing of endangered Swedish cattle breeds.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Selective signatures in composite MONTANA TROPICAL beef cattle reveal potential genomic regions for tropical adaptation.PloS one · 2024Article
- Uncovering genes underlying coat color variation in indigenous cattle breeds through genome-wide positive selection.Animal biotechnology · 2023Article
- Identification of Selection Signals on the X-Chromosome in East Adriatic Sheep: A New Complementary Approach.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Favored single nucleotide variants identified using whole genome Re-sequencing of Austrian and Chinese cattle breeds.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- The impact of using different ancestral reference populations in assessing crossbred population admixture and influence on performance.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Article
- Detection and Visualization of Heterozygosity-Rich Regions and Runs of Homozygosity in Worldwide Sheep Populations.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- Genome-Wide Analysis Reveals Selection Signatures Involved in Meat Traits and Local Adaptation in Semi-Feral Maremmana Cattle.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Genome-wide detection of signatures of selection in indicine and Brazilian locally adapted taurine cattle breeds using whole-genome re-sequencing data.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- Selection signatures in two oldest Russian native cattle breeds revealed using high-density single nucleotide polymorphism analysis.PloS one · 2020Article
- A Comprehensive Analysis of Runs of Homozygosity of Eleven Cattle Breeds Representing Different Production Types.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2019Article
- Identifying loci under positive selection in complex population histories.Genome research · 2019Article
3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The genomics revolution has spurred the undertaking of HapMap studies of numerous species, allowing for population genomics to increase the understanding of how selection has created genetic differences between subspecies populations. The objectives of this study were to (1) develop an approach to detect signatures of selection in subsets of phenotypically similar breeds of livestock by comparing single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) diversity between the subset and a larger population, (2) verify this method in breeds selected for simply inherited traits, and (3) apply this method to the dairy breeds in the International Bovine HapMap (IBHM) study. The data consisted of genotypes for 32,689 SNPs of 497 animals from 19 breeds. For a given subset of breeds, the test statistic was the parametric composite log likelihood (CLL) of the differences in allelic frequencies between the subset and the IBHM for a sliding window of SNPs. The null distribution was obtained by calculating CLL for 50,000 random subsets (per chromosome) of individuals. The validity of this approach was confirmed by obtaining extremely large CLLs at the sites of causative variation for polled (BTA1) and black-coat-color (BTA18) phenotypes. Across the 30 bovine chromosomes, 699 putative selection signatures were detected. The largest CLL was on BTA6 and corresponded to KIT, which is responsible for the piebald phenotype present in four of the five dairy breeds. Potassium channel-related genes were at the site of the largest CLL on three chromosomes (BTA14, -16, and -25) whereas integrins (BTA18 and -19) and serine/arginine rich splicing factors (BTA20 and -23) each had the largest CLL on two chromosomes. On the basis of the results of this study, the application of population genomics to farm animals seems quite promising. Comparisons between breed groups have the potential to identify genomic regions influencing complex traits with no need for complex equipment and the collection of extensive phenotypic records and can contribute to the identification of candidate genes and to the understanding of the biological mechanisms controlling complex traits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.