Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20479145›Full record

ArticleGenetics2010

Evolution of a distinct genomic domain in Drosophila: comparative analysis of the dot chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis.

Wilson Leung, Christopher D Shaffer, Taylor Cordonnier, Jeannette Wong, Michelle S Itano, Elizabeth E Slawson Tempel, Elmer Kellmann, David Michael Desruisseau, Carolyn Cain, Robert Carrasquillo and 21 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Manual annotation ofF1000Research · 2022
    Article
  4. TheGenetics · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

Wilson LeungDepartment of Biology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, USA.
Christopher D Shaffer
Taylor Cordonnier
Jeannette Wong
Michelle S Itano
Elizabeth E Slawson Tempel
Elmer Kellmann
David Michael Desruisseau
Carolyn Cain
Robert Carrasquillo
Tien M Chusak
Katazyna Falkowska
Kelli D Grim
Rui Guan
Jacquelyn Honeybourne
Sana Khan
Louis Lo
Rebecca McGaha
Jevon Plunkett
Justin M Richner
Ryan Richt
Leah Sabin
Anita Shah
Anushree Sharma
Sonal Singhal
Fine Song
Christopher Swope
Craig B Wilen
Jeremy Buhler
Elaine R Mardis
Sarah C R Elgin

Funding

Formation, Structure and Function in HeterochromatinR01GM068388 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ELGIN, SARAH C.R. · 2003 to 2011
$3.9M
Howard Hughes Medical Institute 52005780NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM068388
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The distal arm of the fourth ("dot") chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster is unusual in that it exhibits an amalgamation of heterochromatic properties (e.g., dense packaging, late replication) and euchromatic properties (e.g., gene density similar to euchromatic domains, replication during polytenization). To examine the evolution of this unusual domain, we undertook a comparative study by generating high-quality sequence data and manually curating gene models for the dot chromosome of D. virilis (Tucson strain 15010-1051.88). Our analysis shows that the dot chromosomes of D. melanogaster and D. virilis have higher repeat density, larger gene size, lower codon bias, and a higher rate of gene rearrangement compared to a reference euchromatic domain. Analysis of eight "wanderer" genes (present in a euchromatic chromosome arm in one species and on the dot chromosome in the other) shows that their characteristics are similar to other genes in the same domain, which suggests that these characteristics are features of the domain and are not required for these genes to function. Comparison of this strain of D. virilis with the strain sequenced by the Drosophila 12 Genomes Consortium (Tucson strain 15010-1051.87) indicates that most genes on the dot are under weak purifying selection. Collectively, despite the heterochromatin-like properties of this domain, genes on the dot evolve to maintain function while being responsive to changes in their local environment.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsChromosome MappingChromosomes, InsectDrosophilaDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEuchromatinGenes, InsectGenome, InsectHeterochromatinINDEL MutationOpen Reading FramesSpecies SpecificitySyntenyTandem Repeat SequencesDrosophila ProteinsEuchromatinHeterochromatin

Identifiers

PMID20479145
PMCPMC2927774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.