Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20478658›Full record

ReviewCancer treatment reviews2010

Metastasis and bone loss: advancing treatment and prevention.

Robert E Coleman, Allan Lipton, G David Roodman, Theresa A Guise, Brendon F Boyce, Adam M Brufsky, Philippe Clézardin, Peter I Croucher, Julie R Gralow, Peyman Hadji and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer treatment reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Functional benefits are sustained after a program of supervised resistance exercise in cancer patients with bone metastases: longitudinal results of a pilot study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2014
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 13 institutions in 4 countries.

Robert E ColemanYorkshire Cancer Research Professor of Medical Oncology, Academic Unit of Clinical Oncology, Weston Park Hospital, Whitham Road, Sheffield S102SJ, UK. r.e.coleman@sheffield.ac.uk
Allan Lipton
G David Roodman
Theresa A Guise
Brendon F Boyce
Adam M Brufsky
Philippe Clézardin
Peter I Croucher
Julie R Gralow
Peyman Hadji
Ingunn Holen
Gregory R Mundy
Matthew R Smith
Larry J Suva
University of Sheffield · GBIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USInserm · FRMagee-Womens Hospital · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USPenn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · USPhilipps University of Marburg · DEUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · USUniversity of Washington · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · USVA Pittsburgh Healthcare System · USWeston Park Cancer Centre · GB

Funding

Midcareer Investigator AwardK24CA121990 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI SMITH, MATTHEW RAYMOND · 2007 to 2016
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS K24 CA121990
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor metastasis to the skeleton affects over 400,000 individuals in the United States annually, more than any other site of metastasis, including significant proportions of patients with breast, prostate, lung and other solid tumors. Research on the bone microenvironment and its role in metastasis suggests a complex role in tumor growth. Parallel preclinical and clinical investigations into the role of adjuvant bone-targeted agents in preventing metastasis and avoiding cancer therapy-induced bone loss have recently reported exciting and intriguing results. A multidisciplinary consensus conference convened to review recent progress in basic and clinical research, assess gaps in current knowledge and prioritize recommendations to advance research over the next 5 years. The program addressed three topics: advancing understanding of metastasis prevention in the context of bone pathophysiology; developing therapeutic approaches to prevent metastasis and defining strategies to prevent cancer therapy-induced bone loss. Several priorities were identified: (1) further investigate the effects of bone-targeted therapies on tumor and immune cell interactions within the bone microenvironment; (2) utilize and further develop preclinical models to study combination therapies; (3) conduct clinical studies of bone-targeted therapies with radiation and chemotherapy across a range of solid tumors; (4) develop biomarkers to identify patients most likely to benefit from bone-targeted therapies; (5) educate physicians on bone loss and fracture risk; (6) define optimal endpoints and new measures of efficacy for future clinical trials; and (7) define the optimum type, dose and schedule of adjuvant bone-targeted therapy.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBone DensityBone NeoplasmsBone ResorptionBreast NeoplasmsDiphosphonatesFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasm MetastasisOsteoporosisPrimary PreventionPrognosisProstatic NeoplasmsRisk AssessmentDiphosphonates

Identifiers

PMID20478658
PMCPMC3047387
OpenAlexW2126438645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.