Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20473792›Full record

ArticleAIDS care2010

Prioritising prevention strategies for patients in antiretroviral treatment programmes in resource-limited settings.

A Spaar, C Graber, F Dabis, A Coutsoudis, L Bachmann, J McIntyre, M Schechter, H W Prozesky, S Tuboi, D Dickinson and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS care, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Tuberculosis in HIV programmes in lower-income countries: practices and risk factors.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2011
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 12 institutions in 8 countries.

A SpaarInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland.
C Graber
F Dabis
A Coutsoudis
L Bachmann
J McIntyre
M Schechter
H W Prozesky
S Tuboi
D Dickinson
N Kumarasamy
M Pujdades-Rodriquez
E Sprinz
H J Schilthuis
P Cahn
N Low
M Egger
ART-LINC of IeDEA
University of Bern · CHInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine · CHUniversidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BRBotswana Vaccine Institute (Botswana) · BWFundación Huésped · ARHeineken (Netherlands) · NLHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre · BRPerinatal HIV Research Unit · ZATygerberg Hospital · ZAUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal · ZAYR Gaitonde Centre for AIDS Research and Education · IN

Funding

Observational Antiretroviral Studies In Southern Africa (OASIS) CollaborationU01AI069924 · NIAID · UNIVERSITAT BERN · PI Cleophas Chimbetete, Mary-Ann Davies · 2006 to 2026
$55.9M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI069924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Expanded access to antiretroviral therapy (ART) offers opportunities to strengthen HIV prevention in resource-limited settings. We invited 27 ART programmes from urban settings in Africa, Asia and South America to participate in a survey, with the aim to examine what preventive services had been integrated in ART programmes. Twenty-two programmes participated; eight (36%) from South Africa, two from Brazil, two from Zambia and one each from Argentina, India, Thailand, Botswana, Ivory Coast, Malawi, Morocco, Uganda and Zimbabwe and one occupational programme of a brewery company included five countries (Nigeria, Republic of Congo, Democratic Republic of Congo, Rwanda and Burundi). Twenty-one sites (96%) provided health education and social support, and 18 (82%) provided HIV testing and counselling. All sites encouraged disclosure of HIV infection to spouses and partners, but only 11 (50%) had a protocol for partner notification. Twenty-one sites (96%) supplied male condoms, seven (32%) female condoms and 20 (91%) provided prophylactic ART for the prevention of mother-to child transmission. Seven sites (33%) regularly screened for sexually transmitted infections (STI). Twelve sites (55%) were involved in activities aimed at women or adolescents, and 10 sites (46%) in activities aimed at serodiscordant couples. Stigma and discrimination, gender roles and funding constraints were perceived as the main obstacles to effective prevention in ART programmes. We conclude that preventive services in ART programmes in lower income countries focus on health education and the provision of social support and male condoms. Strategies that might be equally or more important in this setting, including partner notification, prompt diagnosis and treatment of STI and reduction of stigma in the community, have not been implemented widely.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAfricaAnti-Retroviral AgentsAsiaChildCondomsCounselingDelivery of Health CareFemaleHealth EducationHIV InfectionsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalAnti-Retroviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID20473792
PMCPMC2888993
OpenAlexW2110203280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.