Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20473630›Full record

Trial reportInflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.]2010

Inflammatory responses improve with milk ribonuclease-enriched lactoferrin supplementation in postmenopausal women.

Satish Bharadwaj, Tezus A G Naidu, Guru V Betageri, Nemani V Prasadarao, A Satyanarayan Naidu

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.], 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Satish BharadwajN-terminus Research Laboratory, Pomona, CA 91768, USA.
Tezus A G Naidu
Guru V Betageri
Nemani V Prasadarao
A Satyanarayan Naidu
Pomona College · USUniversity of Southern California · USWestern University of Health Sciences · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

OBJECTIVE AND

designA 6-month, randomized clinical study was conducted to evaluate the effect of a ribonuclease-enriched lactoferrin (R-ELF) supplement on the circulating cytokine levels and bone health of postmenopausal women. SUBJECTS: Thirty-eight healthy postmenopausal women, aged 45-60 years, were randomized into placebo and R-ELF groups. TREATMENT: The R-ELF group was supplemented with R-ELF (2 × 125 mg/day) and calcium (100% RDA), while the placebo group received only the calcium supplement.

methodsSerum levels of receptor activator for NF-κB ligand (RANKL), C-reactive protein (CRP) and various pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines were determined by ELISA.

resultsPro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNF-α decreased significantly (-44 and -10%, respectively) while anti-inflammatory IL-10 increased (140%) due to R-ELF supplementation at the end of study. RANKL and CRP were modestly reduced (-50%) relative to their placebo levels, although RANKL elevated initially.

conclusionsR-ELF supplementation showed beneficial effects towards improvement of inflammatory status in postmenopausal women.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsLactoferrinPostmenopauseAnimalsCattleCytokinesFemaleHumansInflammationMiddle AgedMilkPlacebosRibonucleasesCytokinesLactoferrinPlacebosRibonucleases

Identifiers

PMID20473630
OpenAlexW2114457285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.