ArticleFish physiology and biochemistry2010
Optimisation of gene expression analysis in Atlantic salmon lenses by refining sampling strategy and tissue storage.
Article in Fish physiology and biochemistry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anesthesia for euthanasia influences mRNA expression in healthy mice and after traumatic brain injury.Journal of neurotrauma · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Analysis of gene expression in the lens is one of the analytical tools employed to investigate cataract formation in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). High quality RNA preparations are an essential prerequisite for gene expression analysis. The first aim of the present study was to investigate the possible effects of two methods of tissue preservation on the quality of RNA extracted from Atlantic salmon lenses. RNA was extracted from lenses either stored in RNAlater or flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Both tissue preservation methods yielded RNA of similarly high quality. The second aim was to examine if stress related to fish handling and the choice of anaesthesia during the sampling procedure affected gene expression in the lens. Six sampling procedures were tested on groups of sea water adapted Atlantic salmon smolt. Fish were either killed instantaneously (control group) or sampled after 30 min anaesthetised with isoeugenol, after 30 min without anaesthesia, after 120 min anaesthetised with isoeugenol, after 120 min with 15 min anaesthesia with metacaine or after 120 min without anaesthesia. The expression levels of specific genes, of special interest in the study of molecular mechanisms of cataractogenesis, were analysed in lenses by real-time RT-PCR. Fish not anaesthetised had significantly increased levels of heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) mRNA after 30 min compared to the control group. Glutathione reductase (GR) and manganese superoxide dismutase (Mn-SOD) were expressed at significantly lower levels in groups of Atlantic salmon sampled after 120 min anaesthetised with isoeugenol or metacaine, and anaesthetised with isoeugenol, metacaine or without anaesthesia, respectively. The same expression patterns were found in corresponding gill tissues for these two antioxidant genes. In conclusion, preservation in liquid nitrogen instead of RNAlater is recommended due to practical conditions in RNA extraction. A quick sampling protocol with the use of anaesthetics and not exceeding 30 min should be preferred to avoid effects of the sampling procedure on lens gene expression in Atlantic salmon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.