Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20472746›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of ophthalmology2010

Pegaptanib sodium as maintenance therapy in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: the LEVEL study.

Thomas R Friberg, Michael Tolentino, LEVEL Study Group, Pamela Weber, Sunil Patel, Scott Campbell, Mauro Goldbaum

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IV
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Precision Oncology: Advances in Drug Delivery and Imaging.Recent advances in drug delivery and formulation · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. RNA therapeutics: RNAi and antisense mechanisms and clinical applications.Postdoc journal : a journal of postdoctoral research and postdoctoral affairs · 2016
    Article
  7. Fit for the Eye: Aptamers in Ocular Disorders.Nucleic acid therapeutics · 2016
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Ranibizumab for the treatment of degenerative ocular conditions.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2014
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas R FribergOphthalmology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Eye Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. friberg@pitt.edu
Michael Tolentino
LEVEL Study Group
Pamela Weber
Sunil Patel
Scott Campbell
Mauro Goldbaum
Eye and Ear Foundation · USWinter Haven Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo assess the efficacy of pegaptanib as maintenance therapy in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NV-AMD) patients after induction therapy.

methodsA phase IV, prospective, open-label, uncontrolled exploratory study including subjects with subfoveal NV-AMD who had had one to three induction treatments 30-120 days before entry and showed investigator-determined clinical/anatomical NV-AMD improvement. Lesions in the study eye were: any subtype, 12 or fewer disc areas; postinduction centre point thickness (CPT) 275 μm or less or thinning of 100 μm or more (optical coherence tomography); visual acuity (VA) 20/20-20/400. Intravitreal pegaptanib 0.3 mg was administered as maintenance every 6 weeks for 48 weeks with follow-up to week 54. Booster treatment additional unscheduled treatment for wet age-related macular degeneration, was allowed in the study eye at the investigators' discretion for clinical deterioration.

resultsOf 568 enrolled subjects, 86% completed 1 year of pegaptanib. Mean VA improvement during induction (49.6 to 65.5 letters) was well preserved (54-week mean 61.8 letters). Mean CPT was relatively stable during maintenance (20 μm increase during the study). Fifty per cent did not receive unscheduled booster treatment to week 54; 46% did have one such booster (mean 147 days after maintenance initiation).

conclusionsAn induction-maintenance strategy, using non-selective then selective vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors, could be considered for NV-AMD. This approach may have particular relevance for patients with systemic comorbidities who require long-term anti-VEGF therapy for NV-AMD.

Indexed as

AgedAngiogenesis InhibitorsAptamers, NucleotideCorneaFemaleHumansMacular DegenerationMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTomography, Optical CoherenceTreatment OutcomeVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVisual AcuityWet Macular DegenerationAngiogenesis InhibitorsAptamers, NucleotidepegaptanibVascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Identifiers

PMID20472746
PMCPMC2991041
OpenAlexW2117738176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.