Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20472721›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2010

Pork contaminated with Salmonella enterica serovar 4,[5],12:i:-, an emerging health risk for humans.

Elisabeth Hauser, Erhard Tietze, Reiner Helmuth, Ernst Junker, Kathrin Blank, Rita Prager, Wolfgang Rabsch, Bernd Appel, Angelika Fruth, Burkhard Malorny

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Worldwide Epidemiology ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Animal contact-related nontyphoidalFrontiers in public health · 2026
    Article
  6. Veterinary and animal science · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Evolution of serotypes and antibiotic susceptibility of Salmonella spp in the Castellón Health District (Spain)].Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Using SNP addresses forEpidemiology and infection · 2023
    Article
  13. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profile inItalian journal of food safety · 2022
    Article
  19. Antibiotic Resistance ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Elisabeth HauserFederal Institute for Risk Assessment, National Reference Laboratory for Salmonella, Diedersdorfer Weg 1, Berlin, Germany.
Erhard Tietze
Reiner Helmuth
Ernst Junker
Kathrin Blank
Rita Prager
Wolfgang Rabsch
Bernd Appel
Angelika Fruth
Burkhard Malorny

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar 4,[5],12:i:- is a monophasic variant of S. enterica serovar Typhimurium (antigenic formula 4,[5],12:i:1,2). Worldwide, especially in several European countries and the United States, it has been reported among the 10 most frequently isolated serovars in pigs and humans. In the study reported here, 148 strains of the monophasic serovar isolated from pigs, pork, and humans in 2006 and 2007 in Germany were characterized by various phenotypic and genotypic methods. This characterization was done in order to investigate their clonality, the prevalence of identical subtypes in pigs, pork, and humans, and the genetic relatedness to other S. enterica serovar Typhimurium subtypes in respect to the pathogenic and resistance gene repertoire. Two major clonal lineages of the monophasic serovar were detected which can be differentiated by their phage types and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) profiles. Seventy percent of the strains tested belonged to definite phage type DT193, and those strains were mainly assigned to PFGE cluster B. Nineteen percent of the strains were typed to phage type DT120 and of these 86% belonged to PFGE cluster A. Sixty-five percent of the isolates of both lineages carried core multiresistance to ampicillin, streptomycin, tetracycline, and sulfamethoxazole encoded by the genes bla(TEM1-like), strA-strB, tet(B), and sul2. No correlation to the source of isolation was observed in either lineage. Microarray analysis of 61 S. enterica serovar 4,[5],12:i:- and 20 S. enterica serovar Typhimurium isolates tested determining the presence or absence of 102 representative pathogenicity genes in Salmonella revealed no differences except minor variations in single strains within and between the serovars, e.g., by presence of the virulence plasmid in four strains. Overall the study indicates that in Germany S. enterica serovar 4,[5],12:i:- strains isolated from pig, pork, and human are highly related, showing their transmission along the food chain. Since the pathogenicity gene repertoire is highly similar to that of S. enterica serovar Typhimurium, it is essential that interventions are introduced at the farm level in order to limit human infection.

Indexed as

Food MicrobiologyAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsBacteriophage TypingCluster AnalysisDNA FingerprintingDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldGenotypeGermanyHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMolecular EpidemiologySalmonella InfectionsSalmonella Infections, AnimalAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsVirulence Factors

Identifiers

PMID20472721
PMCPMC2901716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.