ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2010
Ligand-binding site prediction of proteins based on known fragment-fragment interactions.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- NLDB: a database for 3D protein-ligand interactions in enzymatic reactions.Journal of structural and functional genomics · 2016Article
- Mechanism of N-Acylthiourea-mediated activation of human histone deacetylase 8 (HDAC8) at molecular and cellular levels.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2015Article
- GalaxySite: ligand-binding-site prediction by using molecular docking.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- webPDBinder: a server for the identification of ligand binding sites on protein structures.Nucleic acids research · 2013Article
- Identification of binding pockets in protein structures using a knowledge-based potential derived from local structural similarities.BMC bioinformatics · 2012Article
- GIRAF: a method for fast search and flexible alignment of ligand binding interfaces in proteins at atomic resolution.Biophysics (Nagoya-shi, Japan) · 2012Article
- Identification of nucleotide-binding sites in protein structures: a novel approach based on nucleotide modularity.PloS one · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationThe identification of putative ligand-binding sites on proteins is important for the prediction of protein function. Knowledge-based approaches using structure databases have become interesting, because of the recent increase in structural information. Approaches using binding motif information are particularly effective. However, they can only be applied to well-known ligands that frequently appear in the structure databases.
resultsWe have developed a new method for predicting the binding sites of chemically diverse ligands, by using information about the interactions between fragments. The selection of the fragment size is important. If the fragments are too small, then the patterns derived from the binding motifs cannot be used, since they are many-body interactions, while using larger fragments limits the application to well-known ligands. In our method, we used the main and side chains for proteins, and three successive atoms for ligands, as fragments. After superposition of the fragments, our method builds the conformations of ligands and predicts the binding sites. As a result, our method could accurately predict the binding sites of chemically diverse ligands, even though the Protein Data Bank currently contains a large number of nucleotides. Moreover, a further evaluation for the unbound forms of proteins revealed that our building up procedure was robust to conformational changes induced by ligand binding. AVAILABILITY: Our method, named 'BUMBLE', is available at http://bumble.hgc.jp/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary Material is available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.