Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20471523›Full record

ReviewThe Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice2010

Vaccines in veterinary medicine: a brief review of history and technology.

Scott McVey, Jishu Shi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Of pigs and men: the best-laid plans for prevention and control of swine fevers.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Scott McVeySchool of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Nebraska Veterinary Diagnostic Center, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0907, USA. dmcvey2@unlnotes.unl.edu
Jishu Shi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of vaccines in veterinary medicine has progressed from an experimental adventure to a routine and relatively safe practice. The common and aggressive use of efficacious vaccines has been responsible for the control and eradication of several diseases. Despite progress in research technologies, diagnostic capabilities, and manufacturing methods, there remain many infectious diseases for which no effective vaccines exist. Global availability, field compliance, effectiveness, and safety are also significant concerns. This review addresses the history, current practices, and potential future improvements of vaccine use in veterinary medicine.

Indexed as

Animal DiseasesAnimalsAnimals, DomesticVaccinationVeterinary Medicine

Identifiers

PMID20471523
PMCPMC7124274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.