ArticleDNA repair2010
XRCC1 deficiency influences the cytotoxicity and the genomic instability induced by Me-lex, a specific inducer of N3-methyladenine.
Article in DNA repair, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Variant base excision repair proteins: contributors to genomic instability.Seminars in cancer biology · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Me-lex is a sequence-specific alkylating agent synthesized to preferentially (>90%) generate N3-methyladenine (3-mA) in the minor groove of double-strand DNA, in A-T rich regions. In this paper we investigated the effect of XRCC1 deficiency in the processing of 3-mA adducts generated by Me-lex, through the molecular analysis of the Hprt mutations and the evaluation of cytogenetic end points such as sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs), micronuclei (MN) and nucleus fragmentation. EM-C11 cells, deficient in XRCC1 activity, showed a 2.5-fold higher sensitivity to the toxicity of Me-lex compared to the DNA repair proficient parental CHO-9 cells, but were not hyper mutable. The spontaneous mutation spectrum at the Hprt locus generated in EM-C11 cells revealed a high percentage of genomic deletions. After Me-lex treatment, the percentage of genomic deletions did not increase, but a class of mutations which appeared to target regulatory regions of the gene significantly increased (p=0.0277), suggesting that non-coding Hprt genomic sequences represent a strong target for the rare mutations induced by Me-lex. The number of SCEs per chromosome increased 3-fold above background in 50mucapital EM, Cyrillic Me-lex treated CHO-9 cells, while at higher Me-lex concentrations a sharp increase in the percentage of MN and fragmented nuclei was observed. In EM-C11 cells the background level of SCEs (0.939+/-0.182) was approximately 10-fold higher than in CHO-9 (0.129+/-0.027) and higher levels of multinucleated cells and MN were also found. In EM-C11, even low doses of Me-lex (25microM) led to a significant increase in genomic damage. These results indicate that XRCC1 deficiency can lead to genomic instability even in the absence of an exogenous genotoxic insult and low levels of Me-lex-induced lesions, i.e., 3-mA and/or a BER intermediate, can exacerbate this instability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.