Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20470795›Full record

ArticleVaccine2010

Utilization of serologic assays to support efficacy of vaccines in nonclinical and clinical trials: meeting at the crossroads.

Dace V Madore, Bruce D Meade, Fran Rubin, Carolyn Deal, Freyja Lynn, Meeting Contributors

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Progress on adenovirus-vectored universal influenza vaccines.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2015
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dace V MadoreMadore Medical Writing, LLC, Pittsford, NY 14534, USA.
Bruce D Meade
Fran Rubin
Carolyn Deal
Freyja Lynn
Meeting Contributors

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 OD999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In May 2009 the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases hosted a workshop on serologic assays that support vaccine efficacy evaluations. The meeting promoted exchange of ideas among investigators from varying disciplines who are working on anti-infectious agent vaccines at different stages of development. The presentations and discussions at the workshop illustrated the challenges common across various pathogens with recurring themes: (1) A thorough understanding of the science regarding the pathogen and the host response to disease and immunization is fundamental to assay selection. (2) The intended use of the immunoassay data must be clearly defined to ensure appropriate specificity, accuracy, and precision; a laboratory must also commit resources to assure data quality and reliability. (3) During vaccine development, an immunoassay may evolve with respect to quality, purpose, and degree of standardization, and, in some cases, must be changed or replaced as data are accumulated. (4) Collaboration on standardized reagents and methods, harmonization efforts, and multidisciplinary teams facilitate consistent generation of quality data. This report provides guidance for effective development and utilization of immunoassays based on the lessons learned from currently licensed vaccines. Investigators are encouraged to create additional opportunities for scientific exchange, noting that the discussed themes are relevant for immunoassays used for other purposes such as therapeutics and diagnostics.

Indexed as

ImmunoassayVaccinesVaccines

Identifiers

PMID20470795
PMCPMC2886496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.