Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20470409›Full record

ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2010

Prescribing patterns of asthma controller therapy for children in UK primary care: a cross-sectional observational study.

Mike Thomas, Tarita Murray-Thomas, Tao Fan, Tim Williams, Stephanie Taylor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. The impact of FDA regulatory activities on incident dispensing of LABA-containing medication: 2005-2011.The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Uncontrolled asthma and its risk factors in adult Chinese asthma patients.Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mike ThomasDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill Health Centre, Westburn Road, Aberdeen, UK. drmike.thomas@btinternet.com
Tarita Murray-Thomas
Tao Fan
Tim Williams
Stephanie Taylor
Health Data Research UK · GBMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USUniversity of Aberdeen · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAsthma management guidelines recommend a stepwise approach to instituting and adjusting anti-inflammatory controller therapy for children with asthma. The objective of this retrospective observational study was to describe prescribing patterns of asthma controller therapies for children in a primary care setting.

methodsData from the UK General Practice Research Database were examined for children with recorded asthma or recurrent wheezing who, from September 2006 through February 2007, were < or = 14 years old at the time of a first asthma controller prescription after > or = 6 months without a controller prescription. We evaluated demographic characteristics, asthma duration, comorbidities, asthma-related health care resource use, and prescribed daily dose of controller medication. In addition, physicians for 635 randomly selected patients completed a survey retrospectively classifying asthma severity at the prescription date and describing therapy and health care utilization for 6 prior months.

resultsWe identified 10,004 children, 5942 (59.4%) of them boys, of mean (SD) age of 8.0 (3.8) years. Asthma controller prescriptions were for inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) monotherapy for 9059 (90.6%) children; ICS plus long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA) for 698 (7.0%); leukotriene antagonist monotherapy for 91 (0.9%); ICS plus leukotriene antagonist for 55 (0.6%); and other therapy for 101 (1.0%), including 45 (0.45%) children who were prescribed LABA as monotherapy. High doses of ICS (> 400 microg) were prescribed for 44/2140 (2.1%) children < 5 years old and for 420/7452 (5.6%) children > or = 5 years. Physicians reported asthma severity as intermittent for 346/635 (55%) patients and as mild, moderate, and severe persistent for 159 (25%), 71 (11%), and 11 (2%), respectively (severity data missing for 48 [8%]). The baseline characteristics and controller therapy prescriptions of the survey cohort were similar to those of the full cohort.

conclusionsPhysician classifications of asthma severity did not always correspond to guideline recommendations, as leukotriene receptor antagonists were rarely used and high-dose ICS or add-on LABA was prescribed even in intermittent and mild disease. In UK primary care, monotherapy with ICS is the most common controller therapy at all levels of asthma severity.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareAdministration, InhalationAdolescentAdrenal Cortex HormonesAdrenergic AgonistsAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornAdrenal Cortex HormonesAdrenergic AgonistsAnti-Asthmatic AgentsLeukotriene Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID20470409
PMCPMC2882363
OpenAlexW2151675554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.