Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20470368›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2010

Chromosome copy number changes carry prognostic information independent of KIT/PDGFRA point mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Mara Silva, Isabel Veiga, Franclim R Ribeiro, Joana Vieira, Carla Pinto, Manuela Pinheiro, Bárbara Mesquita, Catarina Santos, Marta Soares, José Dinis and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Novel Genomic Risk Stratification Model for Primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) in the Adjuvant Therapy Era.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Molecular biomarkers for prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2019
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mara SilvaDepartment of Genetics, Portuguese Oncology Institute - Porto, Rua Dr, António Bernardino Almeida, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal.
Isabel Veiga
Franclim R Ribeiro
Joana Vieira
Carla Pinto
Manuela Pinheiro
Bárbara Mesquita
Catarina Santos
Marta Soares
José Dinis
Lúcio Santos
Paula Lopes
Mariana Afonso
Carlos Lopes
Manuel R Teixeira
Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil · PTUniversidade do Porto · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOncogenic point mutations in KIT or PDGFRA are recognized as the primary events responsible for the pathogenesis of most gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), but additional genomic alterations are frequent and presumably required for tumor progression. The relative contribution of such alterations for the biology and clinical behavior of GIST, however, remains elusive.

methodsIn the present study, somatic mutations in KIT and PDGFRA were evaluated by direct sequencing analysis in a consecutive series of 80 GIST patients. For a subset of 29 tumors, comparative genomic hybridization was additionally used to screen for chromosome copy number aberrations. Genotype and genomic findings were cross-tabulated and compared with available clinical and follow-up data.

resultsWe report an overall mutation frequency of 87.5%, with 76.25% of the tumors showing alterations in KIT and 11.25% in PDGFRA. Secondary KIT mutations were additionally found in two of four samples obtained after imatinib treatment. Chromosomal imbalances were detected in 25 out of 29 tumors (86%), namely losses at 14q (88% of abnormal cases), 22q (44%), 1p (44%), and 15q (36%), and gains at 1q (16%) and 12q (20%). In addition to clinico-pathological high-risk groups, patients with KIT mutations, genomic complexity, genomic gains and deletions at either 1p or 22q showed a significantly shorter disease-free survival. Furthermore, genomic complexity was the best predictor of disease progression in multivariate analysis.

conclusionsIn addition to KIT/PDGFRA mutational status, our findings indicate that secondary chromosomal changes contribute significantly to tumor development and progression of GIST and that genomic complexity carries independent prognostic value that complements clinico-pathological and genotype information.

Indexed as

AneuploidyPoint MutationAdultAgedChromosomes, HumanComparative Genomic HybridizationFemaleGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsGenotypeHumansMaleMiddle AgedPathology, MolecularPrognosisProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitReceptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor alphaProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitReceptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor alpha

Identifiers

PMID20470368
PMCPMC2876987
OpenAlexW1970135928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.