Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20470018›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2010

Organizational commitment among general practitioners: a cross-sectional study of the role of psychosocial factors.

Hannamaria Kuusio, Tarja Heponiemi, Timo Sinervo, Marko Elovainio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Model of Organizational Commitment Applied to Health Management Systems.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Emotional, Social and Occupational Adjustment among Oncology Nurses.International journal of hematology-oncology and stem cell research · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hannamaria KuusioNational Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Helsinki, Finland. hannamaria.kuusio@thl.fi
Tarja Heponiemi
Timo Sinervo
Marko Elovainio

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine whether general practitioners (GP) working in primary health care have lower organizational commitment compared with physicians working in other health sectors. The authors also tested whether psychosocial factors (job demands, job control, and colleague consultation) explain these differences in commitment between GPs and other physicians.

designCross-sectional postal questionnaire. Setting and participants. A postal questionnaire was sent to a random sample of physicians (n = 5000) drawn from the Finnish Association database in 2006. A total of 2841 physicians (response rate 57%) returned the questionnaire, of which 2657 (545 GPs and 2090 other physicians) fulfilled all the participant criteria.

main outcome measuresOrganizational commitment was measured with two different indicators: intention to change jobs and low affective commitment.

resultsGPs were less committed to their organizations than other physicians. Work-related psychosocial factors (high job demands, low job control, and poor colleague consultation) were all significant risk factors for low organizational commitment.

conclusionsThe evidence collected suggests that policies that reduce psychological demands, such as job demands and low control, may contribute to better organizational commitment and, thus, alleviate the shortages of physicians in primary care. Furthermore, giving GPs a stronger say in decisions concerning their work and providing them with more variety in work tasks may even improve the quality of primary care. The strategies for workplace development should focus on redesigning jobs and identifying GPs at higher risk, such as those with especially high job strain.

Indexed as

Personnel LoyaltyCross-Sectional StudiesDecision Making, OrganizationalFamily PracticeFinlandHumansInterprofessional RelationsJob SatisfactionOrganizational InnovationPrimary Health CareProfessional AutonomySurveys and QuestionnairesWork

Identifiers

PMID20470018
PMCPMC3442315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.