Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20468062›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics2010

In their own words: reports of stigma and genetic discrimination by people at risk for Huntington disease in the International RESPOND-HD study.

Janet K Williams, Cheryl Erwin, Andrew R Juhl, Michelle Mengeling, Yvonne Bombard, Michael R Hayden, Kimberly Quaid, Ira Shoulson, Sandra Taylor, Jane S Paulsen and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Hospice Care Experiences Among Decedents With Huntington's Disease.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. New measures to capture end of life concerns in Huntington disease: Meaning and Purpose and Concern with Death and Dying from HDQLIFE (a patient-reported outcomes measurement system).Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Onset of Huntington's disease: can it be purely cognitive?Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2014
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Janet K WilliamsCollege of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Cheryl Erwin
Andrew R Juhl
Michelle Mengeling
Yvonne Bombard
Michael R Hayden
Kimberly Quaid
Ira Shoulson
Sandra Taylor
Jane S Paulsen
I-RESPOND-HD Investigators of the Huntington Study Group

Funding

NEUROBIOLOGICAL PREDICTORS OF HUNTINGTON'S DISEASER01NS040068 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI PAULSEN, JANE S · 2001 to 2013
$48.5M
Response of a Sample Population with the Deleterious HD allele RESPOND-HDR01HG003330 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI PAULSEN, JANE S. · 2005 to 2007
$1.1M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG003330NINDS NIH HHS NS40068NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS040068
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic discrimination may be experienced in the day-to-day lives of people at risk for Huntington disease (HD), encompassing occurrences in the workplace, when seeking insurance, within social relationships, and during other daily encounters. At-risk individuals who have tested either positive or negative for the genetic expansion that causes HD, as well as at-risk persons with a 50% chance for developing the disorder but have not had DNA testing completed the International RESPOND-HD (I-RESPOND-HD) survey. One of the study's purposes was to examine perceptions of genetic stigmatization and discrimination. A total of 412 out of 433 participants provided narrative comments, and 191 provided related codable narrative data. The core theme, Information Control, refers to organizational policies and interpersonal actions. This theme was found in narrative comments describing genetic discrimination perceptions across employment, insurance, social, and other situations. These reports were elaborated with five themes: What They Encountered, What They Felt, What Others Did, What They Did, and What Happened. Although many perceptions were coded as hurtful, this was not true in all instances. Findings document that reports of genetic discrimination are highly individual, and both policy as well as interpersonal factors contribute to the outcome of potentially discriminating events.

Indexed as

Health SurveysSocial StigmaAdultEmploymentFamilyFemaleGenetic TestingHumansHuntington DiseaseInsurance, HealthInternational CooperationInterpersonal RelationsMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID20468062
PMCPMC3035936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.