ArticleHerz2010
Blood glucose control and coronary heart disease.
Article in Herz, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between stress hyperglycemia ratio and all-cause mortality in patients with coronary heart disease.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Why Do High-Risk Patients Develop or Not Develop Coronary Artery Disease? Metabolic Insights from the CAPIRE Study.Metabolites · 2022Article
- The effect of simvastatin on glucose homeostasis in streptozotocin induced type 2 diabetic rats.Journal of diabetes research · 2013Article
- Effects of eicosapentaenoic acid and vitamin C on glycemic indices, blood pressure, and serum lipids in type 2 diabetic Iranian males.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2011Article
- Tight glycemic control and cardiovascular effects in type 2 diabetic patients.Heart views : the official journal of the Gulf Heart AssociationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epidemiologic data support the hypothesis of a direct and independent relationship between hyperglycemia and cardiovascular disease. The lack of a clear-cut threshold value in diabetic patients, and the persistence of the relationship in nondiabetic population as well, suggest that glycemia is a continuous variable, similarly to other cardiovascular risk factors. Moreover, increased plasma glucose levels contribute to cardiovascular risk by activating multiple atherogenic mechanisms. In spite of evident plausibility for hyperglycemia as a cardiovascular risk factor per se, intervention data remain controversial. Results of recent large-scale intervention trials, such as ACCORD, ADVANCE, and VADT, seem to undermine the concept that tight glycemic control confers some protection against cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes, while maintenance of near-normal glycemic control from earlier stage of the disease and during acute coronary events seems to be more beneficial. However, individualized therapies remain the cornerstone of strategies aimed to reduce cardiovascular risk associated to hyperglycemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.