Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20467909›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2010

Defining and measuring the patient-centered medical home.

Kurt C Stange, Paul A Nutting, William L Miller, Carlos R Jaén, Benjamin F Crabtree, Susan A Flocke, James M Gill

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02831296 (Prospective Evaluation of Infants With Spinal Muscular Atrophy), which is not on this map. Cited by 229 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
229citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02831296 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Prospective Evaluation of Infants With Spinal Muscular Atrophy: SPOT SMA

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorMassachusetts General HospitalRan2016Enrolled1,000ConditionsSpinal Muscular Atrophy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

229 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Patient-centred innovation for multimorbidity care: a mixed-methods, randomised trial and qualitative study of the patients' experience.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Trial
  7. Delivering person-centered care with an electronic health record.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2019
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Remote Usability Testing and Satisfaction with a Mobile Health Medication Inquiry System in CKD.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2015
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

169 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kurt C StangeFamily Medicine, Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Sociology and Oncology, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Ave, LC 7136, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA. kcs@case.edu
Paul A Nutting
William L Miller
Carlos R Jaén
Benjamin F Crabtree
Susan A Flocke
James M Gill

Funding

Integrating Practice & Community Cancer ControlK05CA140237 · NCI · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI CRABTREE, BENJAMIN F · 2009 to 2013
$851k
NCI NIH HHS K05 CA140237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The patient-centered medical home (PCMH) is four things: 1) the fundamental tenets of primary care: first contact access, comprehensiveness, integration/coordination, and relationships involving sustained partnership; 2) new ways of organizing practice; 3) development of practices' internal capabilities, and 4) related health care system and reimbursement changes. All of these are focused on improving the health of whole people, families, communities and populations, and on increasing the value of healthcare. The value of the fundamental tenets of primary care is well established. This value includes higher health care quality, better whole-person and population health, lower cost and reduced inequalities compared to healthcare systems not based on primary care. The needed practice organizational and health care system change aspects of the PCMH are still evolving in highly related ways. The PCMH will continue to evolve as evidence comes in from hundreds of demonstrations and experiments ongoing around the country, and as the local and larger healthcare systems change. Measuring the PCMH involves the following: Giving primacy to the core tenets of primary care. Assessing practice and system changes that are hypothesized to provide added value Assessing development of practices' core processes and adaptive reserve. Assessing integration with more functional healthcare system and community resources. Evaluating the potential for unintended negative consequences from valuing the more easily measured instrumental features of the PCMH over the fundamental relationship and whole system aspects. Recognizing that since a fundamental benefit of primary care is its adaptability to diverse people, populations and systems, functional PCMHs will look different in different settings. Efforts to transform practice to patient-centered medical homes must recognize, assess and value the fundamental features of primary care that provide personalized, equitable health care and foster individual and population health.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareDelivery of Health CareHealth Care ReformHumansPatient-Centered CareQuality of Health Care

Identifiers

PMID20467909
PMCPMC2869425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.