Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20467896›Full record

SynthesisDigestive diseases and sciences2010

Abnormal breath testing in IBS: a meta-analysis.

Eric D Shah, Robert J Basseri, Kelly Chong, Mark Pimentel

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 49 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01803724 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2013, after this paper: background citation

Comparison Between Lactulose and Glucose Breath Tests as Predictors of Clinical Benefit From Rifaximin in Irritable Bowel Syndrome Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorPontificia Universidad Catolica de ChileRan2013 to 2014Enrolled120ConditionsIrritable Bowel Syndrome
NCT04557215 phase1 / phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Rifaximin in Combination With N-acetylcysteine (NAC) in Adult Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea

TypeinterventionalSponsorCedars-Sinai Medical CenterRan2020 to 2022Enrolled45ConditionsIrritable Bowel Syndrome With DiarrheaArmsRifaximin, N-acetylcysteine, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 164 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Post-infection Irritable Bowel Syndrome.Gastroenterology clinics of North America · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Microbiome and Its Role in Irritable Bowel Syndrome.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Eric D ShahSchool of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Robert J Basseri
Kelly Chong
Mark Pimentel
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · USTexas Tech University Health Sciences Center · USUCLA Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent evidence suggests a role for enteric bacteria in the development of symptoms in subjects with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The concept was initially based on the common finding of an abnormal lactulose breath test to suggest the presence of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). Despite successful antibiotic studies based on these findings, the premise of bacterial overgrowth was met with skepticism due to the perceived inaccuracies of breath testing in humans. In this study, we conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the studies using breath testing in IBS subjects with comparison to healthy controls.

methodsA literature search was conducted to identify studies in which breath testing was conducted in subjects with IBS. Once abstract titles were identified, studies that examined breath testing in a case-control fashion were identified for paper review. After exclusion criteria were applied, the remaining papers were examined using meta-analysis, among which the prevalence of an abnormal breath test in IBS subjects was compared. Further analysis was conducted among studies with appropriate age- and sex-matched controls.

resultsEleven studies met criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Although heterogeneity was identified among studies on the basis of substrate used, lactulose was the most common substrate. In pooling the 11 studies, breath testing was more often abnormal among IBS subjects than health controls (OR=4.46, 95% CI=1.69-11.80). This was further evident in more appropriately designed age- and sex-matched studies (OR=9.64, 95% CI=4.26-21.82). The overall sensitivity and specificity for breath testing in separating IBS from healthy controls was 43.6 and 83.6%.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates that the breath test findings in IBS appear to be valid. While this meta-analysis does not suggest that the breath test findings imply SIBO, the abnormal fermentation timing and dynamics of the breath test findings support a role for abnormal intestinal bacterial distribution in IBS.

Indexed as

Breath TestsCarbohydratesFermentationAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsFemaleHumansIntestine, SmallIrritable Bowel SyndromeLactuloseMaleOdds RatioPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarbohydratesLactulose

Identifiers

PMID20467896
OpenAlexW2009348105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.