Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20466970›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health2010

The tobacco use management system: analyzing tobacco control from a systems perspective.

Ron Borland, David Young, Ken Coghill, Jian Ying Zhang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Do Tobacco Companies Have an Incentive to Promote "Harm Reduction" Products?: The Role of Competition.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Improving the Odds of Success for Precision Medicine Using the Social Ecological Model.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Research priorities for FCTC Articles 20, 21, and 22: surveillance/evaluation and information exchange.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2013
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ron BorlandVicHealth Centre for Tobacco Control, Cancer Council Victoria, Victoria, Australia. ron.borland@cancervic.org.au
David Young
Ken Coghill
Jian Ying Zhang
Cancer Council Victoria · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We use systems thinking to develop a strategic framework for analyzing the tobacco problem and we suggest solutions. Humans are vulnerable to nicotine addiction, and the most marketable form of nicotine delivery is the most harmful. A tobacco use management system has evolved out of governments' attempts to regulate tobacco marketing and use and to support services that provide information about tobacco's harms and discourage its use. Our analysis identified 5 systemic problems that constrain progress toward the elimination of tobacco-related harm. We argue that this goal would be more readily achieved if the regulatory subsystem had dynamic power to regulate tobacco products and the tobacco industry as well as a responsive process for resourcing tobacco use control activities.

Indexed as

Smoking PreventionSystems TheoryHumansSocial Control PoliciesSystems AnalysisTobacco IndustryTobacco Use Disorder

Identifiers

PMID20466970
PMCPMC2882395
OpenAlexW1976528327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.