Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20466965›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health2010

The "We Card" program: tobacco industry "youth smoking prevention" as industry self-preservation.

Dorie E Apollonio, Ruth E Malone

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Kostygina et al. Respond.American journal of public health · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. When tobacco targets direct democracy.Journal of health politics, policy and law · 2014
    Article
  17. Implementation and research priorities for FCTC Articles 13 and 16: tobacco advertising, promotion, and sponsorship and sales to and by minors.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2013
    Review
  18. Article
  19. "Below the Line": The tobacco industry and youth smoking.The Australasian medical journal · 2011
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dorie E ApollonioDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143-0613, USA. dorie.apollonio@ucsf.edu
Ruth E Malone
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

The Tobacco Problem:Public Health Implications of Contested FramesR01CA120138 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MALONE, RUTH E · 2006 to 2016
$3.0M
Responses to Public Health CampaignsR01CA095989 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MALONE, RUTH E · 2003 to 2006
$857k
NCI NIH HHS CA095989NCI NIH HHS CA120138NCI NIH HHS R01 CA095989NCI NIH HHS R01 CA120138
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The "We Card" program is the most ubiquitous tobacco industry "youth smoking prevention" program in the United States, and its retailer materials have been copied in other countries. The program's effectiveness has been questioned, but no previous studies have examined its development, goals, and uses from the tobacco industry's perspective. On the basis of our analysis of tobacco industry documents released under the 1998 Master Settlement Agreement, we concluded that the We Card program was undertaken for 2 primary purposes: to improve the tobacco industry's image and to reduce regulation and the enforcement of existing laws. Policymakers should be cautious about accepting industry self-regulation at face value, both because it redounds to the industry's benefit and because it is ineffective.

Indexed as

LobbyingOrganizational PolicyAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorChildHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansSmokingSmoking CessationSmoking PreventionTobacco IndustryUnited States

Identifiers

PMID20466965
PMCPMC2882417
OpenAlexW2135368367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.