Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20466529›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in immunology2010

Targeting inhibitory pathways in cancer immunotherapy.

Marcio O Lasaro, Hildegund C J Ertl

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in immunology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marcio O LasaroThe Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. mlasaro@wistar.org
Hildegund C J Ertl
The Wistar Institute · US

Funding

Vector CoreU19AI074078 · NIAID · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI ERTL, HILDEGUND C. J. · 2007 to 2012
$17.9M
Immune response to Adenoviral recombinants of ChimpanzeeP01AI052271 · NIAID · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI ERTL, HILDEGUND C. J. · 2002 to 2006
$9.3M
Correlates of protection against SIV/SHIV challengeP01AI082282 · NIAID · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI ERTL, HILDEGUND C. J. · 2009 to 2010
$5.6M
NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI052271NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI082282NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI074078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical success of adaptive transfer of in vitro expanded antigen-specific CD8(+) T cells isolated from patients' tumors has demonstrated that effector cells of the adaptive immune system can effectively eliminate even large tumor masses. Nevertheless, cancer vaccines that aim to expand such CD8(+) T cells in situ have had remarkably little success in spite of numerous attempts. Recent advances in basic immunology have revealed layers of complexity controlling activation and maintenance of adaptive immune responses that are tightly controlled by immunoinhibitory pathways to avoid horror autotoxicus. During tumor progression the activities of negative pathways increase and together with cancer immune evasion tactics presumably prevent induction of an efficacious immune response by cancer vaccines that solely provide more antigen to an already suppressed system. Cancer vaccines may thus need to readjust the imbalance of the cancer patients' immune system by inhibiting immunoinhibitors; such regimens have shown preclinical efficacy and are now entering clinical trials hopefully ending the Kafkaesque futility of cancer vaccines.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesHumansImmunotherapyMiceNeoplasmsTumor EscapeAntigens, NeoplasmCancer Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID20466529
PMCPMC2894535
OpenAlexW2020509129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.