Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20466084›Full record

ArticleActa biomaterialia2010

Proteomic evaluation of biological nanoparticles isolated from human kidney stones and calcified arteries.

Farooq A Shiekh, Jon E Charlesworth, Sung-Hoon Kim, Larry W Hunter, Muthuvel Jayachandran, Virginia M Miller, John C Lieske

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The role of calcifying nanoparticles in biology and medicine.International journal of nanomedicine · 2012
    Review
  9. Do calcifying nanoparticles really contain 16S rDNA?International journal of nanomedicine · 2012
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. High-speed microscopic imaging of flagella motility and swimming in Giardia lamblia trophozoites.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Nanobacteria in the pathogenesis of urolithiasis: Myth or reality?Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Farooq A ShiekhDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jon E Charlesworth
Sung-Hoon Kim
Larry W Hunter
Muthuvel Jayachandran
Virginia M Miller
John C Lieske
Mayo Clinic in Florida · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

Nanoparticles and Arterial DiseaseR21HL088988 · NHLBI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI MILLER, VIRGINIA M · 2008 to 2009
$416k
NHLBI NIH HHS HL 88988NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL088988NIDDK NIH HHS DK 60202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Calcifying biological nanoparticles (NPs) develop under cell culture conditions from homogenates of diverse tissue samples displaying extraosseous mineralization, including kidney stones and calcified aneurysms. Probes to definitively identify NPs in biological systems are lacking. Therefore, the aim of this study was to begin to establish a proteomic biosignature of NPs in order to facilitate more definitive investigation of their contribution to disease. Biological NPs derived from human kidney stones and calcified aneurysms were completely decalcified by overnight treatment with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid or brief incubation in HCl, as evidenced by lack of a calcium shell and of Alizarin Red S staining, by transmission electron microscopy and confocal microscopy, respectively. Decalcified NPs contained numerous proteins, including some from bovine serum and others of prokaryotic origin. Most prominent of the latter group was EF-Tu, which appeared to be identical to EF-Tu from Staphylococcus epidermidis. A monoclonal antibody against human EF-Tu recognized a protein in Western blots of total NP lysate, as well as in intact NPs by immunofluorescence and immunogold EM. Approximately 8% of NPs were quantitatively recognized by the antibody using flow cytometry. Therefore, we have defined methods to reproducibly decalcify biological NPs, and identified key components of their proteome. These elements, including EF-Tu, can be used as biomarkers to further define the processes that mediate propagation of biological NPs and their contribution to disease.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsArteriesBiomarkersCalcinosisCattleHumansKidney CalculiMolecular Sequence DataNanoparticlesPeptide Elongation Factor TuProteomeBiomarkersPeptide Elongation Factor TuProteome

Identifiers

PMID20466084
PMCPMC2930148
OpenAlexW1974252473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.