ArticleHealth research policy and systems2010
Who needs what from a national health research system: lessons from reforms to the English Department of Health's R&D system.
Article in Health research policy and systems, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- What the policy and stewardship landscape of a national health research system looks like in a developing country like Iran: a qualitative study.Health research policy and systems · 2022Pooled it
- Frameworks for supporting patient and public involvement in research: Systematic review and co-design pilot.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019Pooled it
- Article
- "I am there just to get on with it": a qualitative study on the labour of the patient and public involvement workforce.Health research policy and systems · 2024Article
- Why and how has the United Kingdom become a high producer of health inequalities research over the past 50 years? A realist explanatory case study.Health research policy and systems · 2023Article
- Saving millions of lives but some resources squandered: emerging lessons from health research system pandemic achievements and challenges.Health research policy and systems · 2022Article
- Organising Research and Development for evidence-informed health care: some universal characteristics and a case study from the UK.Health economics, policy, and law · 2021Review
- State of Research Quality and Knowledge Transfer and Translation and Capacity Strengthening Strategies for Sound Health Policy Decision-Making in Palestine.International journal of public health · 2021Article
- Re-imagining Research: A Bold Call, but Bold Enough? Comment on "Experience of Health Leadership in Partnering with University-Based Researchers in Canada: A Call to 'Re-Imagine' Research".International journal of health policy and management · 2020Article
- How to strengthen a health research system: WHO's review, whose literature and who is providing leadership?Health research policy and systems · 2020Article
- 'All the stars were aligned'? The origins of England's National Institute for Health Research.Health research policy and systems · 2019Article
- Public involvement and health research system governance: a qualitative study.Health research policy and systems · 2018Article
- Public involvement in health research systems: a governance framework.Health research policy and systems · 2018Article
- The Palestinian health research system: who orchestrates the system, how and based on what? A qualitative assessment.Health research policy and systems · 2018Article
- Assessing policy-makers', academics' and experts' satisfaction with the performance of the Palestinian health research system: a qualitative study.Health research policy and systems · 2018Article
- Advancing health research through research governance.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2018Article
- Understanding the concept and importance of the health research system in Palestine: a qualitative study.Health research policy and systems · 2018Article
- The Bright Elusive Butterfly of Value in Health Technology Development Comment on "Providing Value to New Health Technology: The Early Contribution of Entrepreneurs, Investors, and Regulatory Agencies".International journal of health policy and management · 2018Article
- 'Knowledge for better health' revisited - the increasing significance of health research systems: a review by departing Editors-in-Chief.Health research policy and systems · 2017Article
- Maximising value from a United Kingdom Biomedical Research Centre: study protocol.Health research policy and systems · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Health research systems consist of diverse groups who have some role in health research, but the boundaries around such a system are not clear-cut. To explore what various stakeholders need we reviewed the literature including that on the history of English health R&D reforms, and we also applied some relevant conceptual frameworks.We first describe the needs and capabilities of the main groups of stakeholders in health research systems, and explain key features of policymaking systems within which these stakeholders operate in the UK. The five groups are policymakers (and health care managers), health professionals, patients and the general public, industry, and researchers. As individuals and as organisations they have a range of needs from the health research system, but should also develop specific capabilities in order to contribute effectively to the system and benefit from it.Second, we discuss key phases of reform in the development of the English health research system over four decades - especially that of the English Department of Health's R&D system - and identify how far legitimate demands of key stakeholder interests were addressed.Third, in drawing lessons we highlight points emerging from contemporary reports, but also attempt to identify issues through application of relevant conceptual frameworks. The main lessons are: the importance of comprehensively addressing the diverse needs of various interacting institutions and stakeholders; the desirability of developing facilitating mechanisms at interfaces between the health research system and its various stakeholders; and the importance of additional money in being able to expand the scope of the health research system whilst maintaining support for basic science.We conclude that the latest health R&D strategy in England builds on recent progress and tackles acknowledged weaknesses. The strategy goes a considerable way to identifying and more effectively meeting the needs of key groups such as medical academics, patients and industry, and has been remarkably successful in increasing the funding for health research. There are still areas that might benefit from further recognition and resourcing, but the lessons identified, and progress made by the reforms are relevant for the design and coordination of national health research systems beyond England.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.