SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2010
Covering ileo- or colostomy in anterior resection for rectal carcinoma.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04372992 (Multicenter Randomized Controlled Phase III Trial Comparing Ileostomy Closure Before or After Adjuvant Therapy in Patients Operated for Rectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 95 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Multicenter Randomized Controlled Phase III Trial Comparing Ileostomy Closure Before or After Adjuvant Therapy in Patients Operated for Rectal Cancer
Who cites it
95 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 244 citations in OpenAlex.
- Protective ostomies in ovarian cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Impact of a defunctioning ileostomy and time to stoma closure on bowel function after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Techniques in coloproctology · 2021Pooled it
- Failure of enhanced recovery after surgery in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review.International journal of colorectal disease · 2020Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of temporary loop ileostomy closure during or after adjuvant chemotherapy following rectal cancer resection: the dilemma remains.International journal of colorectal disease · 2019Pooled it
- The application of defunctioning stomas after low anterior resection of rectal cancer.Surgery today · 2019Pooled it
- The influence of diverting loop ileostomy vs. colostomy on postoperative morbidity in restorative anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2019Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of elective surgical complications related to defunctioning loop ileostomy compared with loop colostomy after low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2015Pooled it
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of published, randomized, controlled trials comparing suture anastomosis to stapled anastomosis for ileostomy closure.Techniques in coloproctology · 2013Pooled it
- Prophylactic anastomotic drainage for colorectal surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2004Pooled it
- Trial
- Cost analysis in a randomized trial of early closure of a temporary ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer (EASY trial).Surgical endoscopy · 2020Trial
- Functional outcomes from a randomized trial of early closure of temporary ileostomy after rectal excision for cancer.The British journal of surgery · 2019Trial
- Quality of life in a randomized trial of early closure of temporary ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer (EASY trial).The British journal of surgery · 2018Trial
- Does ghost ileostomy have a role in the laparoscopic rectal surgery era? A randomized controlled trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2015Trial
- Early versus conventional stoma closure following bowel surgery: A randomized controlled trial.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology AssociationTrial
- A novel real-time assessment of intestinal perfusion with dual imaging using ICG fluorescence and capillaroscopy in colorectal surgery.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Article
- Surgically Relative Risk Factors for Lower Colorectal Anastomotic Dehiscence and Rectovaginal Fistulas in Complex Deep Endometriosis Cases: A Single-Center Retrospective-Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- The application of intraoperative strategies to reduce protective stoma in mid and low rectal cancer: a retrospective study utilizing indocyanine green and precise anatomical techniques.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- A new way to remedy anastomotic leakage after TaTME: A case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2025Article
- Article
35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnastomotic leakage is one of the most important complications that occur after surgical low anterior resection for rectal cancer. There are indications that anastomotic leak is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, frequent re-operation or radiological drainage, and prolonged hospital stay. Defunctioning stoma can be useful for patients undergoing a rectal surgery.
objectivesTo determine the efficacy of protective defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches were conducted November 2009. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (from 1966) and EMBASE (from 1980). SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised clinical trials comparing the use of stoma versus "no stoma" in patients that received low anterior resection for rectal cancer. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Six randomised controlled trials were identified and included in this review. Five trials were fully published in peer-reviewed journals. An attempt was made to obtain further information from the authors of the trial that was available only in an abstract form. The studies analysed the following outcomes: clinical anastomotic leakage, urgent reoperation, mortality and length of postoperative hospital stay. Review authors extracted the data independently, the risk ratios (RR) were estimated for the dichotomous outcomes and standardised mean difference were estimated for the continuous outcome MAIN
resultsAll the trials reported results for clinical anastomotic leakage, urgent reoperation and mortality. Only two trials reported the results for length of postoperative hospital stay.With respect to controls, use of covering stoma was significantly associated with less anastomotic leakage (RR 0.33; 95%CI [0.21, 0.53]) and less urgent reoperation (RR 0.23; 95%CI [0.12, 0.42] ). There was no significant difference in terms of mortality (RR 0.58; 95%CI [0.14, 2.33]). There was no evidence of statistical heterogeneity in any of the comparisons. AUTHORS'
conclusionsCovering stoma seems to be useful to prevent anastomotic leakage and urgent re-operations in patients receiving low anterior resection for rectal cancer. However, covering stoma does not seems to offer advantage in term of 30 days or long term mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.