SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2010
Stroke liaison workers for stroke patients and carers: an individual patient data meta-analysis.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Information provision for stroke survivors and their carers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Telephone interventions, delivered by healthcare professionals, for providing education and psychosocial support for informal caregivers of adults with diagnosed illnesses.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Pooled it
- The effectiveness of integrated care interventions in improving patient quality of life (QoL) for patients with chronic conditions. An overview of the systematic review evidence.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2017Pooled it
- Self-Management Support Interventions for Stroke Survivors: A Systematic Meta-Review.PloS one · 2015Pooled it
- Organising health care services for people with an acquired brain injury: an overview of systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials.BMC health services research · 2014Pooled it
- Uncovering treatment burden as a key concept for stroke care: a systematic review of qualitative research.PLoS medicine · 2013Pooled it
- Information provision for stroke patients and their caregivers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Non-pharmacological interventions for caregivers of stroke survivors.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011Pooled it
- Therapy-based rehabilitation services for stroke patients at home.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2003Pooled it
- Trial
- Organising Support for Carers of Stroke Survivors (OSCARSS): a cluster randomised controlled trial with economic evaluation.BMJ open · 2021Trial
- Taking Charge after Stroke: A randomized controlled trial of a person-centered, self-directed rehabilitation intervention.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2020Trial
- An extended stroke rehabilitation service for people who have had a stroke: the EXTRAS RCT.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2020Trial
- Trial
- Promoting psychosocial well-being following stroke: study protocol for a randomized, controlled trial.BMC psychology · 2018Trial
- Biopsychosocial Intervention for Stroke Carers (BISC): protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT).BMJ open · 2017Trial
- Trial
- Comparison of effects between home visits with telephone calls and telephone calls only for transitional discharge support: a randomised controlled trial.Age and ageing · 2014Trial
- Implementing and sustaining 6-month post-stroke reviews: a complexity-informed, context-sensitive programme theory for clinical practice.Frontiers in stroke · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMany patients experience depression, social isolation and anxiety post stroke. These are associated with a poorer outcome. Ameliorating these problems may improve patient wellbeing.
objectivesTo evaluate the impact of a healthcare worker or volunteer whose multi-dimensional roles have been grouped under the title 'stroke liaison worker'. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (searched February 2009), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2009), MEDLINE (1966 to 2009), EMBASE (1980 to 2009) and four other databases. We performed a cited reference search, searched conference proceedings and trials registers, checked reference lists and contacted authors and trial investigators. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials investigating the impact of a stroke liaison worker versus usual care. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We invited trialists to participate in a review of individual patient data. Primary outcomes for patients were subjective health status and extended activities of daily living. Primary outcomes for carers were subjective health status including measures of carer strain. MAIN
resultsWe included 16 trials involving 4759 participants. Analysis did not show a significant overall difference for subjective health status (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.11 to 0.04, P = 0.34) or extended activities of daily living (SMD 0.04, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.11, P = 0.22). There was no overall significant effect for the outcome of carer subjective health status (SMD 0.04, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.14, P = 0.37). Patients with mild to moderate disability (Barthel 15 to 19) had a significant reduction in dependence (odds ratio (OR) 0.62, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.87, P = 0.006). This would equate to 10 fewer dependent patients (95% CI 17 fewer to 4 fewer) for every 100 patients seen by the stroke liaison worker. Similar results were seen for the outcome of death or dependence for the subgroup with Barthel 15 to 19 (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.81, P = 0.002). This risk difference equates to 11 fewer dead or dependent patients (95% CI 17 fewer to 4 fewer) for every 100 patients seen by the stroke liaison worker. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThere is no evidence for the effectiveness of this multifaceted intervention in improving outcomes for all groups of patients or carers. Patients with mild to moderate disability benefit from a reduction in death and disability. Patients and carers do report improved satisfaction with some aspects of service provision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.