Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20464717›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2010

Graft type for femoro-popliteal bypass surgery.

Christopher P Twine, Alexander D McLain

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Graft type for femoro-popliteal bypass surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Guideline
  6. Guideline
  7. Interposition vein cuff for infragenicular prosthetic bypass graft.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christopher P TwineGeneral and Vascular Surgery, Royal Gwent Hospital, Cardiff Road, Newport, UK, NP20 2UB.
Alexander D McLain
Royal Gwent Hospital · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office CZB/4/788
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFemoro-popliteal bypass is implemented to save limbs that might otherwise require amputation, in patients with ischaemic rest pain or tissue loss; and to improve walking distance in patients with severe life-limiting claudication. Contemporary practice involves using autologous vein, polyterafluoroethylene (PTFE) or Dacron as a bypass conduit.This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 1999 and previously updated in 2002.

objectivesThe objective of this review was to determine the most effective type of graft for femoro-popliteal bypass surgery. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group searched their Specialised Register (last searched January 2010) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 1 for last search). The authors searched reference lists of relevant articles, and handsearched conference proceedings from the British and European Vascular Surgical Societies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing femoro-popliteal grafts. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors (CT and ADM) screened studies, extracted data and assessed trials. MAIN

resultsThirteen randomised control trials were included with a total of 2313 patients (1955 above knee, 358 below knee bypass surgery). Seven graft types were compared (reversed and in situ autologous vein, PTFE with and without vein cuff, human umbilical vein (HUV), Dacron and heparin bonded Dacron (HBD).Above the knee, there was a benefit in primary patency for autologous vein over PTFE (P = 0.0001) and HUV (P = 0.0003) by 60 months. Dacron showed primary patency benefit over PTFE by 24 months (P = 0.02), continuing to 60 months (P = 0.02). HUV also showed benefit over PTFE by 24 months (P = 0.0003) in one trial. Below the knee, in the one trial there was a significant benefit in primary patency for PTFE with a vein cuff when compared to PTFE alone at all time intervals to 24 months (P = 0.03).Limited data were available for limb survival. Antiplatelet and anticoagulant protocols varied extensively between trials, and in some cases within trials. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere was a clear primary patency benefit for autologous vein when compared to synthetic materials for above knee bypasses. In the long term (five years) Dacron confers a small primary patency benefit over PTFE for above knee bypass. PTFE with a vein cuff improved primary patency when compared to PTFE alone for below knee bypasses. Further randomised data is needed to ascertain whether this information translates into improvement in limb survival.

Indexed as

Arterial Occlusive DiseasesBlood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationFemoral ArteryHumansIntermittent ClaudicationLegPolyethylene TerephthalatesPolytetrafluoroethylenePopliteal ArteryRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSaphenous VeinTransplantation, AutologousUmbilical VeinsVascular Surgical ProceduresPolyethylene TerephthalatesPolytetrafluoroethylene

Identifiers

PMID20464717
OpenAlexW4244099096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.