Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20464584›Full record

ReviewNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2010

Clinical review of headache in pregnancy.

Paola Torelli, G Allais, G C Manzoni

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Headache and pregnancy: a systematic review.The journal of headache and pain · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Headaches during pregnancy.Current pain and headache reports · 2011
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paola TorelliHeadache Centre, Department of Neuroscience, University of Parma, c/o Ospedale Maggiore, Via Gramsci 14, 43126, Parma, Italy. paola.torelli1@unipr.it
G Allais
G C Manzoni
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Headache is a common disorder in the general population. Among women, the primary headache form that is more heavily affected by the physiologic hormonal variations occurring through a woman's lifetime is migraine. Migraine without aura (MO) and migraine with aura (MA) show a different clinical pattern during pregnancy. MO improves or disappears while it is not infrequent for women to have their first attack of MA during this period; usually, during pregnancy MA do not improve. In MO women who continue to suffer from migraine during pregnancy, clinical observation and the few data currently available from the literature suggest that in the gestational period their attacks are nonetheless less disabling than those occurring outside this period. Even though the duration of the attacks is unchanged, their severity tends to be mild or moderate. Treatment of migraine during pregnancy is discussed.

Indexed as

Pregnancy ComplicationsFemaleHeadache DisordersHumansPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID20464584
OpenAlexW2035320146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.