ReviewOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2010
Comparing and contrasting the effects of strontium ranelate and other osteoporosis drugs on microarchitecture.
Review in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effect of PTH(1-84) or strontium ranelate on bone formation markers in postmenopausal women with primary osteoporosis: results of a randomized, open-label clinical trial.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2011Trial
- Comparison of parathyroid hormone and strontium ranelate in combination with whole-body vibration in a rat model of osteoporosis.Journal of bone and mineral metabolism · 2017Article
- Osteoporosis drug effects on cortical and trabecular bone microstructure: a review of HR-pQCT analyses.BoneKEy reports · 2016Review
- Nuclear receptors in bone physiology and diseases.Physiological reviews · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Altered bone microstructure is a major component of osteoporosis and bone fragility. Whilst an important standard by which to diagnose and make treatment decisions for osteoporosis, the evaluation of bone mineral mass by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at spine or hip is not sufficient for understanding the complex nature of bone microstructure nor to evaluate specific treatment effects on cancellous and cortical bone. Various alternatives to DXA have been developed, enabling the measurement of bone geometry and/or microarchitecture and/or bone strength including hip strength analysis, peripheral and central QCT, 3D analyses of iliac crest bone biopsies, and more recently HR-pQCT, which allows longitudinal assessment of bone microstructure at the distal radius and tibia. The efficacy of treatments for osteoporosis can be evaluated using these techniques. A true improvement of bone microstructure above baseline has not been demonstrated with anti-resorptive treatments; however, they may prevent the decay of cancellous bone and, potentially, cortical thinning. Anabolic agents such as parathyroid hormone (PTH) increase cancellous bone volume and cortical thickness; however, the improvement of cortical bone strength by PTH may be limited by an increase in cortical porosity. Strontium ranelate has been shown to improve not only the trabecular network but also cortical thickness, contributing to its anti-fracture efficacy at vertebral, non-vertebral, and hip sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.