ArticleHNO2010
[Swallowing-related quality of life in oral cavity cancer. The German version of the Anderson Dysphagia Inventory].
Article in HNO, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient-Reported Dysphagia After Multimodal Therapy and Radial Forearm Free-Flap Reconstruction for OPSCC: Associations With FEES Findings, Psychological Distress, and Xerostomia.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2026Article
- Review
- Head and Neck Cancer: A Study on the Complex Relationship between QoL and Swallowing Function.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Article
- Review
- Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcome measurements in patients with cystinosis.JIMD reports · 2023Article
- Inhalative Treatment of Laryngitis Sicca in Patients with Sjögren's Syndrome-A Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Application of an L-shaped anterolateral thigh flap in reconstruction after hemiglossectomy.BMC surgery · 2022Article
- Article
- Assessment of Bulbar Function in Adult Patients with 5q-SMA Type 2 and 3 under Treatment with Nusinersen.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Systematic evaluation of laryngeal impairment in Sjögren's syndrome.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021Article
- Validation and Reliability of the French Version of the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire.Dysphagia · 2019Article
- Article
- [Dysphagia management of acute and long-term critically ill intensive care patients].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2014Review
- Review
- Article
- Preservation of organ function in head and neck cancer.GMS current topics in otorhinolaryngology, head and neck surgery · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe objective of this study was to validate the German version of the Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (ADI), as well as to grade it by using health-related quality of life as an external criterion. PATIENTS AND
methodsA total of 102 patients (26 women, 76 men) aged 34-90 years (61.1+/-10.8) with a treated squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity participated in the study. All study participants independently completed the German version of the ADI and the SF-36 questionnaire on health-related quality of life. The German ADI was tested for its validity and reliability, and subjected to a factor analysis.
resultsThe internal consistency reliability of the ADI was calculated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient and was equal to 0.942. In the split-half reliability the Spearman-Brown coefficient scored 0.916. Factor analysis showed a one-factor result. The correlation coefficients between the point scores of the German ADI and the following clinical parameters demonstrated construct validity: radiation (p<0.001), T-classification (p=0.002), surgical method (p=0.018), not, however, tumor site (p=0.115). The grading system was as follows: scores <55 are regarded as "definitely noticeable"; scores 55-70 are considered as "more noticeable than not"; while scores >70 are classified as " more unnoticeable than not".
conclusionThe German translation of the ADI is a validated and reliable method to assess swallowing-related quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20464359What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.