ArticlePloS one2010
Familiarity breeds contempt: kangaroos persistently avoid areas with experimentally deployed dingo scents.
Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.
- Buffering effects of shelter and palatable foods mitigate fear responses in foraging wild mice.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Establishment of Hematological and Plasma Biochemical Reference Values and Analysis of Risk Factors for Pet Sugar Gliders (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Odour-mediated Interactions Between an Apex Reptilian Predator and its Mammalian Prey.Journal of chemical ecology · 2022Article
- Exploiting common senses: sensory ecology meets wildlife conservation and management.Conservation physiology · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- The Australian dingo: untamed or feral?Frontiers in zoology · 2019Article
- Article
- Structure-Activity Relationships of Alkylpyrazine Analogs and Fear-Associated Behaviors in Mice.Journal of chemical ecology · 2017Article
- Parasite and predator risk assessment: nuanced use of olfactory cues.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2015Article
- Learning to distinguish between predators and non-predators: understanding the critical role of diet cues and predator odours in generalisation.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Behavioral responses to odors from other species: introducing a complementary model of allelochemics involving vertebrates.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2015Review
- The scent of wolves: pyrazine analogs induce avoidance and vigilance behaviors in prey.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2015Review
- Are single odorous components of a predator sufficient to elicit defensive behaviors in prey species?Frontiers in neuroscience · 2015Review
- A review of factors influencing the stress response in Australian marsupials.Conservation physiology · 2014Article
- Pyrazine analogs are active components of wolf urine that induce avoidance and fear-related behaviors in deer.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2014Article
- The control of defecation in humans: an evolutionary advantage?Techniques in coloproctology · 2013Article
- Pyrazine analogues are active components of wolf urine that induce avoidance and freezing behaviours in mice.PloS one · 2013Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhether or not animals habituate to repeated exposure to predator scents may depend upon whether there are predators associated with the cues. Understanding the contexts of habituation is theoretically important and has profound implication for the application of predator-based herbivore deterrents. We repeatedly exposed a mixed mob of macropod marsupials to olfactory scents (urine, feces) from a sympatric predator (Canis lupus dingo), along with a control (water). If these predator cues were alarming, we expected that over time, some red kangaroos (Macropus rufous), western grey kangaroos (Macropus fuliginosus) and agile wallabies (Macropus agilis) would elect to not participate in cafeteria trials because the scents provided information about the riskiness of the area. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsWe evaluated the effects of urine and feces independently and expected that urine would elicit a stronger reaction because it contains a broader class of infochemicals (pheromones, kairomones). Finally, we scored non-invasive indicators (flight and alarm stomps) to determine whether fear or altered palatability was responsible for the response. Repeated exposure reduced macropodid foraging on food associated with 40 ml of dingo urine, X = 986.75+/-3.97 g food remained as compared to the tap water control, X = 209.0+/-107.0 g (P<0.001). Macropodids fled more when encountering a urine treatment, X = 4.50+/-2.08 flights, as compared to the control, X = 0 flights (P<0.001). There was no difference in effect between urine or feces treatments (P>0.5). Macropodids did not habituate to repeated exposure to predator scents, rather they avoided the entire experimental area after 10 days of trials (R(2) = 83.8; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Responses to urine and feces were indistinguishable; both elicited fear-based responses and deterred foraging. Despite repeated exposure to predator-related cues in the absence of a predator, macropodids persistently avoided an area of highly palatable food. Area avoidance is consistent with that observed from other species following repeated anti-predator conditioning, However, this is the first time this response has been experimentally observed among medium or large vertebrates - where a local response is observed spatially and an area effect is revealed over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.