Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20463903›Full record

ArticlePloS one2010

On the control of acute rodent malaria infections by innate immunity.

Beth F Kochin, Andrew J Yates, Jacobus C de Roode, Rustom Antia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Simulation modelling for immunologists.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Exploring the collaboration between antibiotics and the immune response in the treatment of acute, self-limiting infections.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The evolution of drug resistance and the curious orthodoxy of aggressive chemotherapy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Beth F KochinDepartment of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America. bkochin@emory.edu
Andrew J Yates
Jacobus C de Roode
Rustom Antia
Emory University · US

Funding

Containing Bioterrorist and Emerging Infectious DiseasesU01GM070749 · NIGMS · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI HALLORAN, M ELIZABETH, LONGINI, IRA M · 2004 to 2013
$8.3M
Quantititive models of CD8+ immune memoryR01AI049334 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI ANTIA, RUSTOM NOSHIR · 2001 to 2011
$1.6M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI049334NIAID NIH HHS R01AI049334NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM070749NIGMS NIH HHS U01-GM070749
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Does specific immunity, innate immunity or resource (red blood cell) limitation control the first peak of the blood-stage parasite in acute rodent malaria infections? Since mice deficient in specific immunity exhibit similar initial dynamics as wild-type mice it is generally viewed that the initial control of parasite is due to either limitation of resources (RBC) or innate immune responses. There are conflicting views on the roles of these two mechanisms as there is experimental evidence supporting both these hypotheses. While mathematical models based on RBC limitation are capable of describing the dynamics of primary infections, it was not clear whether a model incorporating the key features of innate immunity would be able to do the same. We examine the conditions under which a model incorporating parasite and innate immunity can describe data from acute Plasmodium chabaudi infections in mice. We find that innate immune response must decay slowly if the parasite density is to fall rather than equilibrate. Further, we show that within this framework the differences in the dynamics of two parasite strains are best ascribed to differences in susceptibility to innate immunity, rather than differences in the strains' growth rates or their propensity to elicit innate immunity. We suggest that further work is required to determine if innate immunity or resource limitation control acute malaria infections in mice.

Indexed as

AnimalsImmunity, InnateMalariaMiceModels, ImmunologicalPlasmodium chabaudi

Identifiers

PMID20463903
PMCPMC2865546
OpenAlexW2054429547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.