Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20463240›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2010

Short- and long-term memory are modulated by multiple isoforms of the fragile X mental retardation protein.

Paromita Banerjee, Brian P Schoenfeld, Aaron J Bell, Catherine H Choi, Michael P Bradley, Paul Hinchey, Maria Kollaros, Jae H Park, Sean M J McBride, Thomas C Dockendorff

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Genes · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Modeling Fragile X Syndrome inFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  10. Altered expression of the FMR1 splicing variants landscape in premutation carriers.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Gene regulatory mechanisms · 2017
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Dysregulation of mRNA Localization and Translation in Genetic Disease.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. PDE-4 inhibition rescues aberrant synaptic plasticity in Drosophila and mouse models of fragile X syndrome.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Paromita BanerjeeDepartment of Neurosciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.
Brian P Schoenfeld
Aaron J Bell
Catherine H Choi
Michael P Bradley
Paul Hinchey
Maria Kollaros
Jae H Park
Sean M J McBride
Thomas C Dockendorff
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · USUniversity of Tennessee at Knoxville · USCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · USLehigh Valley Hospital-Pocono · USWayne State University · US

Funding

In vivo Functions of the Drosophila Fragile X OrthologueR15GM068468 · NIGMS · MIAMI UNIVERSITY OXFORD · PI DOCKENDORFF, THOMAS C · 2003 to 2007
$351k
Autism Speaks AS2087NIGMS NIH HHS GM068468NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM068468
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diversity of protein isoforms arising from alternative splicing is thought to modulate fine-tuning of synaptic plasticity. Fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP), a neuronal RNA binding protein, exists in isoforms as a result of alternative splicing, but the contribution of these isoforms to neural plasticity are not well understood. We show that two isoforms of Drosophila melanogaster FMRP (dFMR1) have differential roles in mediating neural development and behavior functions conferred by the dfmr1 gene. These isoforms differ in the presence of a protein interaction module that is related to prion domains and is functionally conserved between FMRPs. Expression of both isoforms is necessary for optimal performance in tests of short- and long-term memory of courtship training. The presence or absence of the protein interaction domain may govern the types of ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes dFMR1 assembles into, with different RNPs regulating gene expression in a manner necessary for establishing distinct phases of memory formation.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedBase SequenceCircadian RhythmDNA Mutational AnalysisDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsFemaleFragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1MaleMemoryMemory, Short-TermMolecular Sequence DataMotor ActivityNeuropsychological TestsDrosophila ProteinsFMR1 protein, DrosophilaFragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1Protein Isoforms

Identifiers

PMID20463240
PMCPMC2880182
OpenAlexW2062270565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.