Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20462450›Full record

ArticleMolecular cancer2010

Smad2 and Smad6 as predictors of overall survival in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Flavia R R Mangone, Fernando Walder, Simone Maistro, Fátima S Pasini, Carlos N Lehn, Marcos B Carvalho, M Mitzi Brentani, Igor Snitcovsky, Miriam H H Federico

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cancer, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A novel and independent survival prognostic model for OSCC: the functions and prognostic values of RNA-binding proteins.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Flavia R R MangoneDisciplina de Oncologia, Departamento de Radiologia, LIM 24, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Avenida Dr Arnaldo 455, São Paulo, Brasil. flavia@lim24.fm.usp.br
Fernando Walder
Simone Maistro
Fátima S Pasini
Carlos N Lehn
Marcos B Carvalho
M Mitzi Brentani
Igor Snitcovsky
Miriam H H Federico
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRHospital Heliópolis · BRUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo test if the expression of Smad1-8 mRNAs were predictive of survival in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). PATIENTS AND

methodsWe analyzed, prospectively, the expression of Smad1-8, by means of Ribonuclease Protection Assay in 48 primary, operable, oral SCC. In addition, 21 larynx, 10 oropharynx and 4 hypopharynx SCC and 65 matched adjacent mucosa, available for study, were also included. For survival analysis, patients were categorized as positive or negative for each Smad, according to median mRNA expression. We also performed real-time quantitative PCR (QRTPCR) to asses the pattern of TGFbeta1, TGFbeta2, TGFbeta3 in oral SCC.

resultsOur results showed that Smad2 and Smad6 mRNA expression were both associated with survival in Oral SCC patients. Cox Multivariate analysis revealed that Smad6 positivity and Smad2 negativity were both predictive of good prognosis for oral SCC patients, independent of lymph nodal status (P = 0.003 and P = 0.029, respectively). In addition, simultaneously Smad2- and Smad6+ oral SCC group of patients did not reach median overall survival (mOS) whereas the mOS of Smad2+/Smad6- subgroup was 11.6 months (P = 0.004, univariate analysis). Regarding to TGFbeta isoforms, we found that Smad2 mRNA and TGFbeta1 mRNA were inversely correlated (p = 0.05, R = -0.33), and that seven of the eight TGFbeta1+ patients were Smad2-. In larynx SCC, Smad7- patients did not reach mOS whereas mOS of Smad7+ patients were only 7.0 months (P = 0.04). No other correlations were found among Smad expression, clinico-pathological characteristics and survival in oral, larynx, hypopharynx, oropharynx or the entire head and neck SCC population.

conclusionSmad6 together with Smad2 may be prognostic factors, independent of nodal status in oral SCC after curative resection. The underlying mechanism which involves aberrant TGFbeta signaling should be better clarified in the future.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Squamous CellFemaleGene ExpressionHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMouth NeoplasmsPrognosisReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, MessengerSmad2 ProteinBiomarkers, TumorRNA, MessengerSmad2 ProteinSMAD2 protein, humanSmad6 ProteinSMAD6 protein, humanTransforming Growth Factor beta1Transforming Growth Factor beta2Transforming Growth Factor beta3

Identifiers

PMID20462450
PMCPMC2885344
OpenAlexW2140609420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.