SynthesisArthritis care & research2010
Patient perspective of measuring treatment efficacy: the rheumatoid arthritis patient priorities for pharmacologic interventions outcomes.
Synthesis in Arthritis care & research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
71 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Reduction of biologics in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Rheumatology international · 2020Pooled it
- Patient goals in rheumatoid arthritis care: A systematic review and qualitative synthesis.Musculoskeletal care · 2017Pooled it
- The effect of tofacitinib on residual pain in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis.RMD open · 2022Trial
- Efficacy and safety of sarilumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy for the treatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (MONARCH): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group phase III trial.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2017Trial
- Self-management of fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised controlled trial of group cognitive-behavioural therapy.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2011Trial
- Foot and ankle pain is associated with subsequent daily activity limitation independent of DAS28-CRP in rheumatoid arthritis: a longitudinal cohort study.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
- Clinical Trials in Older Adults with Cardiovascular Multimorbidity: A Perspective on Pragmatic Trial Design.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Patient Preferences for Treatments of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Discrete Choice Experiment Evaluating Preference for Novel Neuroimmune Modulation Devices.Journal of patient experience · 2026Article
- Pain management and related factor exploration of rheumatoid arthritis based on nursing science precision health model: a retrospective analysis of 287 cases.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- The development of a data dictionary with clinical variables for artificial intelligence-driven tools in research on abdominal aortic aneurysms and peripheral arterial disease.European heart journal. Digital health · 2025Article
- Successful Collection of Patient-Reported Outcomes Shows Improvement in Quality of Life, Depression, and Disease Activity among Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Real-World Study.Crohn's & colitis 360 · 2025Article
- Article
- Using patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS®) measures in rheumatoid arthritis clinical care, research, and trials.Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism · 2025Article
- Evaluating Meaningful Changes in Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System-Fatigue Scores from Three Phase 3 Clinical Trials of Sarilumab for Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.ACR open rheumatology · 2025Article
- Development and Content Validity Evaluation of the Condition-Agnostic Treatment Goal Evaluation Scale (TGES) for Use in Chronic Conditions.Patient related outcome measures · 2025Article
- Development and refinement of patient care recommendations in brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer using nominal group technique workshops.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Article
- How to Distinguish Non-Inflammatory from Inflammatory Pain in RA?Current rheumatology reports · 2024Review
- Pain sensitisation and joint inflammation in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis.RMD open · 2024Article
- Observational
- Article
11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveCollaboration with patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) highlights that outcomes important to them include fatigue, coping, and life enjoyment. However, these are not commonly measured in clinical trials. There is little evidence about which outcomes patients would prioritize, or what factors influence patients' prioritization. Our objective was to develop a complementary core set with patients to promote inclusion of their priority outcomes in pharmacologic interventions.
methodsNominal groups were conducted with RA patients to rank 63 outcomes generated from previous in-depth interviews. A multicenter postal survey provided the final selection of core outcomes for the Rheumatoid Arthritis Patient Priorities for Pharmacologic Interventions (RAPP-PI), in which RA patients rated the importance of the priority outcomes from the nominal groups and ranked the top 6.
resultsTwenty-six patients participated in 5 nominal group discussions and reduced the 63 initial outcomes to the 32 most important. A total of 254 participants in the survey ranked priority treatment outcomes to form the RAPP-PI: pain, activities of daily living, joint damage, mobility, life enjoyment, independence, fatigue, and valued activities. The 8 priorities represent 3 domains of treatment outcomes: direct impact of RA, psychosocial well-being, and function/participation. Chi-square tests showed that disease severity, disease duration, sex, and patients' perceptions of managing, self-efficacy, and normality influenced the selection of priority treatment outcomes.
conclusionCollaboration with patients has captured their perspectives of priority outcomes from pharmacologic interventions. Although there is some overlap with professional core outcomes, the additional use of this complementary set will give a broader evaluation of effectiveness of interventions from the key stakeholders: patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.