ArticleSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2010
[Pain perception of adolescents with chronic functional pain : adaptation and psychometric validation of the Pain Perception Scale (SES) by Geissner].
Article in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Self-Efficacy as a Central Mediator of Pain, Function, and Depression: Insights of a Cross-Sectional Analysis of Depersonalized Data from the German Pain e-Registry.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Pain quality patterns in delayed onset muscle soreness of the lower back suggest sensitization of fascia rather than muscle afferents: a secondary analysis study.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2024Article
- Assessment of pain quality reveals distinct differences between nociceptive innervation of low back fascia and muscle in humans.Pain reports · 2018Article
- [Distinctive features of orofacial pain perception].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPain perception is a central aspect of the multidimensional model of chronic pain. Up to now, validated measurement tools are lacking in the German language for measuring pain perception in adolescents. The aim of this study was to examine and adapt the well-established Pain Perception Scale for Adults by Geissner (SES) for use in adolescents with chronic pain to provide a measure for clinical diagnosis and evaluation of treatment effects. MATERIAL AND
methodsPrincipal component, reliability and item analyses were conducted on a sample with 139 adolescents. To test validity, age and sex effects, correlations with pain-related constructs, differences between treatment groups (inpatients vs outpatients) and concordance between adolescents and their parents were analysed.
resultsFindings support a two-factor solution with one affective and one sensory factor; three additional sensory items were included in the final version. The scales show good internal consistency. Consistent with hypotheses, we found significant correlations with pain characteristics, emotional and cognitive variables as well as pain-related disability. Inpatients and outpatients show a significant difference in affective pain perception. Concordance between parents and adolescents was high.
conclusionWith this questionnaire there is now a validated German assessment tool to measure pain perception in adolescents with chronic pain (Pain Perception Scale for Adolescents, SES-J). Due to its practicability it is suitable for clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.