Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20461113›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2010

A screening methodology based on Random Forests to improve the detection of gene-gene interactions.

Lizzy De Lobel, Pierre Geurts, Guy Baele, Francesc Castro-Giner, Manolis Kogevinas, Kristel Van Steen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Effective Macrosomia Prediction Using Random Forest Algorithm.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Genotypes Associated withFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Detecting epistasis in human complex traits.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2014
    Review
  14. Epistatic effects of multiple receptor genes on pathophysiology of asthma - its limits and potential for clinical application.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2014
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Genetic polymorphisms and associated susceptibility to asthma.International journal of general medicine · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lizzy De LobelDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. Lizzy.Delobel@ugent.be
Pierre Geurts
Guy Baele
Francesc Castro-Giner
Manolis Kogevinas
Kristel Van Steen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The search for susceptibility loci in gene-gene interactions imposes a methodological and computational challenge for statisticians because of the large dimensionality inherent to the modelling of gene-gene interactions or epistasis. In an era in which genome-wide scans have become relatively common, new powerful methods are required to handle the huge amount of feasible gene-gene interactions and to weed out false positives and negatives from these results. One solution to the dimensionality problem is to reduce data by preliminary screening of markers to select the best candidates for further analysis. Ideally, this screening step is statistically independent of the testing phase. Initially developed for small numbers of markers, the Multifactor Dimensionality Reduction (MDR) method is a nonparametric, model-free data reduction technique to associate sets of markers with optimal predictive properties to disease. In this study, we examine the power of MDR in larger data sets and compare it with other approaches that are able to identify gene-gene interactions. Under various interaction models (purely and not purely epistatic), we use a Random Forest (RF)-based prescreening method, before executing MDR, to improve its performance. We find that the power of MDR increases when noisy SNPs are first removed, by creating a collection of candidate markers with RFs. We validate our technique by extensive simulation studies and by application to asthma data from the European Committee of Respiratory Health Study II.

Indexed as

Decision TreesEpistasis, GeneticGenetic Association StudiesModels, GeneticAlgorithmsAsthmaComputational BiologyComputer SimulationEuropeGene ExpressionGenetic MarkersGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingHumansMultifactor Dimensionality ReductionPolymorphism, Single NucleotideGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID20461113
PMCPMC2987456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.