ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2010
Process description and evaluation of Canadian Physical Activity Guidelines development.
Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effect of aerobic exercise on cognition, academic achievement, and psychosocial function in children: a systematic review of randomized control trials.Preventing chronic disease · 2013Pooled it
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of exercise on depression in adolescents.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2022Review
- Protocol for national mental health guidelines for community sport in Australia.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2022Article
- Physical activity for cognitive health: what advice can we give to older adults with subjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment?Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2019Article
- How Can Physical Activity Be Promoted Among Children and Adolescents? A Systematic Review of Reviews Across Settings.Frontiers in public health · 2019Review
- How can the impact of national recommendations for physical activity be increased? Experiences from Germany.Health research policy and systems · 2018Article
- Wearable Sensors and the Assessment of Frailty among Vulnerable Older Adults: An Observational Cohort Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- Formulation of evidence-based messages to promote the use of physical activity to prevent and manage Alzheimer's disease.BMC public health · 2017Article
- Evidence-informed recommendations for constructing and disseminating messages supplementing the new Canadian Physical Activity Guidelines.BMC public health · 2013Article
- An Experience Sampling Study of Physical Activity and Positive Affect: Investigating the Role of Situational Motivation and Perceived Intensity Across Time.Health psychology research · 2013Article
- A systematic review of three approaches for constructing physical activity messages: What messages work and what improvements are needed?The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2010Article
- Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2010Article
- Advancing the future of physical activity guidelines in Canada: an independent expert panel interpretation of the evidence.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis paper describes the process used to arrive at recommended physical activity guidelines for Canadian school-aged children and youth (5-17 years), adults (18-64 years) and older adults (>/=65 years).
methodsThe Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology (CSEP) Physical Activity Measurement and Guidelines (PAMG) Steering Committee used the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research Evaluation (AGREE II) Instrument to inform the guideline development process. Fourteen background papers and five systematic reviews were completed. Systematic review authors appraised and synthesized the data, and proposed specific recommendations at an international consensus conference of invited experts and key stakeholders. Independently, an international panel of experts interpreted the evidence from the systematic reviews and developed recommendations following attendance at the Consensus Conference.
resultsUsing the AGREE II instrument as a guide, specific foci for each of the guidelines were defined and systematic review methodology was used to synthesize the evidence base. The expert panel, CSEP PAMG Steering Committee and methodological consultants reviewed the systematic reviews and Consensus Statement. The expert panel achieved consensus on the level of evidence informing the physical activity guidelines and developed a separate document outlining key recommendations, interpretation of the evidence and justification of each recommendation.
conclusionThe CSEP and Public Health Agency of Canada followed a rigorous process to examine the evidence informing potential revisions to existing physical activity guidelines for Canadians. It is believed that this is the first physical activity guideline development process in the world to be guided and assessed by AGREE II and AMSTAR instruments.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.