ArticleBiology direct2010
Lack of conservation of bacterial type promoters in plastids of Streptophyta.
Article in Biology direct, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Construction of DNA Tools for Hyperexpression inACS synthetic biology · 2021Article
- Highly Conserved Elements and Chromosome Structure Evolution in Mitochondrial Genomes in Ciliates.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Article
- Regulation of Expression and Evolution of Genes in Plastids of Rhodophytic Branch.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016Article
- A Database of Plastid Protein Families from Red Algae and Apicomplexa and Expression Regulation of the moeB Gene.BioMed research international · 2015Article
- Evolutionary rewiring: a modified prokaryotic gene-regulatory pathway in chloroplasts.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2013Article
- Transcription regulation of plastid genes involved in sulfate transport in Viridiplantae.BioMed research international · 2013Article
- Modeling RNA polymerase competition: the effect of σ-subunit knockout and heat shock on gene transcription level.Biology direct · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We demonstrate the scarcity of conserved bacterial-type promoters in plastids of Streptophyta and report widely conserved promoters only for genes psaA, psbA, psbB, psbE, rbcL. Among the reasonable explanations are: evolutionary changes of sigma subunit paralogs and phage-type RNA polymerases possibly entailing the loss of corresponding nuclear genes, de novo emergence of the promoters, their loss together with plastome genes; functional substitution of the promoter boxes by transcription activation factor binding sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.