Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20459597›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2010

The dissection of transcriptional modules regulated by various drugs of abuse in the mouse striatum.

Marcin Piechota, Michal Korostynski, Wojciech Solecki, Agnieszka Gieryk, Michal Slezak, Wiktor Bilecki, Barbara Ziolkowska, Elzbieta Kostrzewa, Iwona Cymerman, Lukasz Swiech and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 103 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
103citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

103 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 165 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Signaling and Pharmacology of the Dopamine D1 Receptor.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Neural Network Connectivity Following Opioid Dependence is Altered by a Common Genetic Variant in the µ-Opioid Receptor,The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marcin PiechotaDepartment of Molecular Neuropharmacology, Institute of Pharmacology PAS, Smetna 12, Krakow, 31-343, Poland.
Michal Korostynski
Wojciech Solecki
Agnieszka Gieryk
Michal Slezak
Wiktor Bilecki
Barbara Ziolkowska
Elzbieta Kostrzewa
Iwona Cymerman
Lukasz Swiech
Jacek Jaworski
Ryszard Przewlocki
Maj Institute of Pharmacology · PLInternational Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVarious drugs of abuse activate intracellular pathways in the brain reward system. These pathways regulate the expression of genes that are essential to the development of addiction. To reveal genes common and distinct for different classes of drugs of abuse, we compared the effects of nicotine, ethanol, cocaine, morphine, heroin and methamphetamine on gene expression profiles in the mouse striatum.

resultsWe applied whole-genome microarray profiling to evaluate detailed time-courses (1, 2, 4 and 8 hours) of transcriptome alterations following acute drug administration in mice. We identified 42 drug-responsive genes that were segregated into two main transcriptional modules. The first module consisted of activity-dependent transcripts (including Fos and Npas4), which are induced by psychostimulants and opioids. The second group of genes (including Fkbp5 and S3-12), which are controlled, in part, by the release of steroid hormones, was strongly activated by ethanol and opioids. Using pharmacological tools, we were able to inhibit the induction of particular modules of drug-related genomic profiles. We selected a subset of genes for validation by in situ hybridization and quantitative PCR. We also showed that knockdown of the drug-responsive genes Sgk1 and Tsc22d3 resulted in alterations to dendritic spines in mice, possibly reflecting an altered potential for plastic changes.

conclusionsOur study identified modules of drug-induced genes that share functional relationships. These genes may play a critical role in the early stages of addiction.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceAnimalsBehavior, AnimalBinding SitesCells, CulturedCentral Nervous System StimulantsChromosomes, MammalianCluster AnalysisDendritic SpinesGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationGene Knockdown TechniquesGene Regulatory NetworksIllicit DrugsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLCentral Nervous System StimulantsIllicit DrugsRNA, MessengerTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID20459597
PMCPMC2898085
OpenAlexW1993298019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.