Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20459554›Full record

ArticleHistopathology2010

Determination of HER2 amplification in primary breast cancer using dual-colour chromogenic in situ hybridization is comparable to fluorescence in situ hybridization: a European multicentre study involving 168 specimens.

Tomás García-Caballero, Dorthe Grabau, Andrew R Green, John Gregory, Arno Schad, Elke Kohlwes, Ian O Ellis, Sarah Watts, Jens Mollerup

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Histopathology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Fixation strategies for retinal immunohistochemistry.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2015
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Accurate assessment of HER2 gene status for invasive component of breast cancer by combination of immunohistochemistry and chromogenic In Situ hybridization.Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Medical sciences = Hua zhong ke ji da xue xue bao. Yi xue Ying De wen ban = Huazhong keji daxue xuebao. Yixue Yingdewen ban · 2013
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Chromogenic in situ hybridization compared with other approaches to evaluate HER2/neu status in breast carcinomas.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2013
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Tomás García-CaballeroDepartment of Morphological Sciences, School of Medicine-University Clinical Hospital, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Dorthe Grabau
Andrew R Green
John Gregory
Arno Schad
Elke Kohlwes
Ian O Ellis
Sarah Watts
Jens Mollerup
University of Nottingham · GBJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DELund University · SEUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela · ESUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsFluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) can be used to reveal several genomic imbalances relevant to proper cancer diagnosis and to the correct treatment regime. However, FISH requires expensive and advanced fluorescence microscopes in addition to expertise in fluorescence microscopy. To determine whether a newly developed dual-colour chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) method is a suitable alternative to FISH, we analysed the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 gene (HER2) amplification level of 168 breast cancer specimens using dual-colour CISH and FISH and compared the results. METHODS AND

resultsWe found 100% agreement between HER2 status determined by FISH and dual-colour CISH. Furthermore, we observed that the time used to score slides was significantly reduced by 28% in dual-colour CISH compared with the FISH protocol. Concordance between HER2 protein status and dual-colour CISH or FISH was equally good with an overall agreement of 96.8%. Correlation between the HER2/centromere 17 gene ratios obtained with dual-colour CISH and FISH was highly significant with an overall correlation coefficient (rho) of 0.96.

conclusionsWe conclude that dual-colour CISH and bright field microscopy are excellent alternatives to FISH when analysing the HER2 status of primary breast cancer.

Indexed as

Genes, erbB-2Hybridization, GeneticIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceBreast NeoplasmsCentromereColorEuropeFemaleGene AmplificationHumansIn Situ HybridizationMicroscopyMicroscopy, FluorescenceNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID20459554
PMCPMC2855864
OpenAlexW1994378111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.