Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20458884›Full record

ReviewReviews in the neurosciences2010

Molecular specificity of multiple hippocampal processes governing fear extinction.

Jelena Radulovic, Natalie C Tronson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in the neurosciences, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Interoception in Fear Learning and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Neural substrates of appetitive and aversive prediction error.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Serotonin 5-HTInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Sex Differences in Context Fear Generalization and Recruitment of Hippocampus and Amygdala during Retrieval.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jelena RadulovicDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The Asher Center for Study and Treatment of Depressive Disorders, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA. j-radulovic@northwestern.edu
Natalie C Tronson

Funding

Mechanisms of Stress-Enhanced Aversive ConditioningR01MH078064 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI RADULOVIC, JELENA · 2007 to 2025
$8.3M
Hippocampal Mechanisms of Fear ExtinctionR01MH073669 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI RADULOVIC, JELENA · 2006 to 2010
$1.6M
NIMH NIH HHS MH073669NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH073669NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH078064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over many years, fear extinction has been conceptualized as one dominant process, new inhibitory learning, which serves to dampen previously acquired fear. Here we present an alternative view, that brain region-specific processing of representations, expectations and emotional attributes of the fear-provoking event, recruits unique mechanisms that interdependently contribute to the conditioning and extinction of fear. The co-occurrence of these mechanisms within the fear circuit can thus be tracked and differentiated at a molecular and cellular level. Among others, the transcriptional regulators cFos, cAMP-dependent response element binding protein (CREB), Zif268, and extracellular signal-regulated kinases (Erk) stand out as hippocampal nuclear markers signaling novelty, arousal, retrieval, and prediction error, respectively. Consistent with evidence from human studies, these findings indicate that, beyond inhibitory learning, fear extinction requires modification of the emotional attributes and expectations that define the threatening context. Given the likely dysregulation of one or more of these processes in anxiety disorders, a key research challenge for the future is the identification and enhancement of individual extinction mechanisms to target the specific components of fear. Environmental stimuli lacking affective properties (conditioned stimuli, CS) rapidly become threatening if presented with stressful events (unconditioned stimuli, US). Consequently, based on a CS-US association, the presentation of the CS triggers species-specific fear responses until the US consistently stops occurring. At that point, new learning takes place and the fear response declines, a phenomenon termed extinction. The view that extinction occurs because a new, inhibitory CS-noUS association gains control over behavior, has remained dominant in the field. The implications of impaired fear regulation in the development of anxiety disorders have stimulated intense research in this area. Rodent studies identified the circuits involved in the conditioning and extinction of fear of salient cues, generating data that were confirmed in humans with brain imaging approaches. Nevertheless, research with experimental animals has not fully taken advantage of human data in order to better interpret extinction mechanisms in the framework of learning, expectation and emotion governing fear-motivated behavior. The present article aims to summarize recent molecular evidence on fear extinction, focusing on hippocampal mechanisms and experimental models of contextual fear, and compare the results with other relevant fear paradigms and human imaging studies. Instead of conceptualizing extinction learning as one process, such as CS-noUS association or inhibitory learning, we propose that fear extinction reflects the behavioral output of several region-specific learning processes that modify different components of the conditioning memory. The significance of these findings is discussed in the framework of fear regulation and anxiety disorders.

Indexed as

FearAnimalsAvoidance LearningConditioning, ClassicalExtinction, PsychologicalHippocampusHumansModels, AnimalSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID20458884
PMCPMC2922903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.